Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
New Business Structures Creating Organizational Opportunities and Challenges for Work Disability Prevention.
Ekberg, Kerstin; Pransky, Glenn S; Besen, Elyssa; Fassier, Jean-Baptise; Feuerstein, Michael; Munir, Fehmidah; Blanck, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Ekberg K; Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. kerstin.ekberg@liu.se.
  • Pransky GS; Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA.
  • Besen E; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Fassier JB; Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA.
  • Feuerstein M; Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Munir F; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Blanck P; School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
J Occup Rehabil ; 26(4): 480-489, 2016 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27704343
Purpose Flexible work arrangements are growing in order to develop resource-efficient production and because of advanced technologies, new societal values, changing demographics, and globalization. The article aims to illustrate the emerging challenges and opportunities for work disability prevention efforts among workers in alternate work arrangements. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, "Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability," held October 14-16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a roundtable discussion with experts having direct employer experience. Results Both worker and employer perspectives were considered, and four common alternate work arrangements were identified: (a) temporary and contingent employment; (b) small workplaces; (c) virtual work/telework; and (d) lone workers. There was sparse available research of return-to-work (RTW) and workplace disability management strategies with regard to alternate work patterns. Limited research findings and a review of the grey literature suggested that regulations and guidelines concerning disabled workers are often ambiguous, leading to unsatisfactory protection. At the workplace level, there was a lack of research evidence on how flexible work arrangements could be handled or leveraged to support RTW and prevent disability. Potential negative consequences of this lack of organizational guidance and information are higher costs for employers and insurers and feelings of job insecurity, lack of social support and integration, or work intensification for disabled workers. Conclusions Future studies of RTW and workplace disability prevention strategies should be designed to reflect the multiple work patterns that currently exist across many working populations, and in particular, flexible work arrangements should be explored in more detail as a possible mechanism for preventing disability. Labor laws and policies need to be developed to fit flexible work arrangements.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Ocupacional / Local de Trabalho / Emprego Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Ocupacional / Local de Trabalho / Emprego Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article