Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of molecular biomarkers for predicting adjacent breast cancer of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy.
Polat, Ayfer Kamali; Soran, Atilla; Kanbour-Shakir, Amal; Menekse, Ebru; Levent Balci, Fatih; Johnson, Ronald.
Afiliação
  • Polat AK; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Soran A; Department of General Surgery, University of Ondokuz Mayis Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
  • Kanbour-Shakir A; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Menekse E; Department of Pathology - Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Levent Balci F; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Johnson R; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Cancer Biomark ; 17(3): 293-300, 2016 Sep 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27802205
BACKGROUND: Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH) is a disease of the proliferative breast lesion characterized with atypia and when diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB), excisional biopsy is the current management to exclude adjacent cancer, which may found 10 to 20%. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to investigate the role of biomarkers on surgical decision after the diagnosis of ADH on CNB. METHODS: Patients with pure ADH on core biopsy were retrospectively selected, and categorized according to final pathology after excision into three groups: Group I (n: 39) ADH; Group II (n: 27) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and Group III (n: 9) invasive cancer (IC). Immunohistochemical analyses were performed using biomarkers MUC1, Ki67, Cyclin B1, and Cyclin D1. RESULTS: Only Cyclin D1 was significant in between group analysis by one-way ANOVA (64.74, 49.44, and 51.11, respectively; p= 0.01). However when appropriate cut-off levels (2%-50%) were used for each biomarkers using X2 test, no statistical significance was found. CONCLUSION: MUC1, Ki67, Cyclin B, and Cyclin D1have failed to predict adjacent cancer on core biopsy specimens with ADH. Further surgery is warranted for all ADH cases diagnosed on core biopsies until a new predictor is identified.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Biomarcadores / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Biomarcadores / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article