Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized multicenter study evaluating Xolair persistence of response after long-term therapy.
Ledford, Dennis; Busse, William; Trzaskoma, Benjamin; Omachi, Theodore A; Rosén, Karin; Chipps, Bradley E; Luskin, Allan T; Solari, Paul G.
Afiliação
  • Ledford D; Morsani College of Medicine and James A. Haley VA Hospital, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla. Electronic address: dledford@health.usf.edu.
  • Busse W; University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
  • Trzaskoma B; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, Calif.
  • Omachi TA; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, Calif.
  • Rosén K; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, Calif.
  • Chipps BE; Capital Allergy & Respiratory Disease Center, Sacramento, Calif.
  • Luskin AT; Dean Clinic, Madison, Wis.
  • Solari PG; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, Calif.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 140(1): 162-169.e2, 2017 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27826098
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Few data are available to assist clinicians with decisions regarding long-term use of asthma therapies, including omalizumab.

OBJECTIVE:

We sought to evaluate the benefit and persistence of response in subjects continuing or withdrawing from long-term omalizumab treatment.

METHODS:

Evaluating the Xolair Persistency Of Response After Long-Term Therapy (XPORT) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study that included subjects with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma receiving long-term omalizumab. Subjects were randomized by using a hierarchical dynamic randomization scheme to continue their same dose of omalizumab or withdraw to placebo and were then followed every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was any protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. The secondary outcome was time to first protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. Exploratory outcomes included changes in Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Control Test scores.

RESULTS:

Significantly more subjects in the omalizumab group (67%) had no protocol-defined exacerbation than in the placebo group (47.7%); an absolute difference of 19.3% (95% CI, 5.0%, 33.6%) represents a 40.1% relative difference. Time to first protocol-defined exacerbation analysis revealed a significantly different between-group exacerbation pattern that was consistent with the primary analysis. Subjects continuing omalizumab had significantly better asthma control (mean [SD] change from baseline to week 52 Asthma Control Test score, -1.16 [4.14] vs placebo, -2.88 [5.38], P = .0188; Asthma Control Questionnaire score, 0.22 [0.66] vs placebo, 0.63 [1.13], P = .0039). Discontinuation of omalizumab was associated with an increase in free IgE levels and an increase in basophil expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor. No safety concerns were noted.

CONCLUSION:

Continuation of omalizumab after long-term treatment results in continued benefit, as evidenced by improved symptom control and reduced exacerbation risk.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos / Omalizumab Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos / Omalizumab Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article