Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT).
Volders, J H; Haloua, M H; Krekel, N M A; Negenborn, V L; Kolk, R H E; Lopes Cardozo, A M F; Bosch, A M; de Widt-Levert, L M; van der Veen, H; Rijna, H; Taets van Amerongen, A H M; Józwiak, K; Meijer, S; van den Tol, M P.
Afiliação
  • Volders JH; Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP Ede, The Netherlands. Electronic address: voldersjh@gmail.com.
  • Haloua MH; Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: mhaloua@gmail.com.
  • Krekel NM; Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: n.krekel@vumc.nl.
  • Negenborn VL; Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: vlnegenborn@gmail.com.
  • Kolk RH; Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.h.e.kolk@student.vu.nl.
  • Lopes Cardozo AM; Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.m.f.lopes.cardozo@nwz.nl.
  • Bosch AM; Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP Ede, The Netherlands. Electronic address: BoschA1@zgv.nl.
  • de Widt-Levert LM; Department of Surgery, Waterland Hospital, Waterlandlaan 250, 1441 RN Purmerend, The Netherlands. Electronic address: ldewidt@wlz.nl.
  • van der Veen H; Department of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Vondellaan 13, 1942 LE Beverwijk, The Netherlands. Electronic address: hvanderveen@rkz.nl.
  • Rijna H; Department of Surgery, Kennemergasthuis, Boerhaavelaan 22, 2035 RC Haarlem, The Netherlands. Electronic address: rijna@kg.nl.
  • Taets van Amerongen AH; Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.h.m.taets@gmail.com.
  • Józwiak K; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, NKI-AVL, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: k.jozwiak@nki.nl.
  • Meijer S; Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.meijer52@kpnplanet.nl.
  • van den Tol MP; Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: MP.vandentol@vumc.nl.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 43(4): 649-657, 2017 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27916314
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The multicenter randomized controlled COBALT trial demonstrated that ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery (USS) results in a significant reduction of margin involvement (3.1% vs. 13%) and excision volumes compared to palpation-guided surgery (PGS). The aim of the present study was to determine long term oncological and patient-reported outcomes including quality of life (QoL), together with their progress over time.

METHODS:

134 patients with T1-T2 breast cancer were randomized to USS (N = 65) or PGS (N = 69). Cosmetic outcomes were assessed with the Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment cosmetic results (BCCT.core) software, panel-evaluation and patient self-evaluation on a 4-point Likert-scale. QoL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30/-BR23 questionnaire.

RESULTS:

No locoregional recurrences were reported after mean follow-up of 41 months. Seven patients (5%) developed distant metastatic disease (USS 6.3%, PGS 4.4%, p = 0.466), of whom six died of disease (95.5% overall survival). USS achieved better cosmetic outcomes compared to PGS, with poor outcomes of 11% and 21% respectively, a result mainly attributable to mastectomies due to involved margins following PGS. There was no difference after 1 and 3 years in cosmetic outcome. Dissatisfied patients included those with larger excision volumes, additional local therapies and worse QoL. Patients with poor/fair cosmetic outcomes scored significantly lower on aspects of QoL, including breast-symptoms, body image and sexual enjoyment.

CONCLUSION:

By significantly reducing positive margin status and lowering resection volumes, USS improves the rate of good cosmetic outcomes and increases patient-satisfaction. Considering the large impact of cosmetic outcome on QoL, USS has great potential to improve QoL following breast-conserving therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mastectomia Segmentar / Satisfação do Paciente / Carcinoma Lobular / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Cirurgia Assistida por Computador Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mastectomia Segmentar / Satisfação do Paciente / Carcinoma Lobular / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Cirurgia Assistida por Computador Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article