Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing the phosphorus use in cotton by using CSM-CROPGRO-cotton model for semi-arid climate of Vehari-Punjab, Pakistan.
Amin, Asad; Nasim, Wajid; Mubeen, Muhammad; Nadeem, Muhammad; Ali, Liaqat; Hammad, Hafiz Mohkum; Sultana, Syeda Refat; Jabran, Khawar; Rehman, M Habib Ur; Ahmad, Shakeel; Awais, Muhammad; Rasool, Atta; Fahad, Shah; Saud, Shah; Shah, Adnan Noor; Ihsan, Zahid; Ali, Shahzad; Bajwa, Ali Ahsan; Hakeem, Khalid Rehman; Ameen, Asif; Rehman, Hafeez Ur; Alghabar, Fahad; Jatoi, Ghulam Hussain; Akram, Muhammad; Khan, Aziz; Islam, Faisal; Ata-Ul-Karim, Syed Tahir; Rehmani, Muhammad Ishaq Asif; Hussain, Sajid; Razaq, Muhammad; Fathi, Amin.
Afiliação
  • Amin A; Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, Pakistan.
  • Nasim W; Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, Pakistan. wajidnaseem2001@gmail.com.
  • Mubeen M; CIHEAM-Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier (IAMM), 3191 route de Mende, Montpellier, France. wajidnaseem2001@gmail.com.
  • Nadeem M; CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, National Research Flagship, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia. wajidnaseem2001@gmail.com.
  • Ali L; Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, Pakistan.
  • Hammad HM; Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, Pakistan.
  • Sultana SR; Adaptive Research Farm, Punjab Agriculture Department, Vehari, Pakistan.
  • Jabran K; Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, Pakistan.
  • Rehman MHU; Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, Pakistan.
  • Ahmad S; Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey.
  • Awais M; Department of Agronomy, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
  • Rasool A; AgWeatherNet Program, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, 99350-8694, USA.
  • Fahad S; Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • Saud S; Department of Agronomy, University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahwalpur-Pakistan, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
  • Shah AN; State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, 550081, China.
  • Ihsan Z; College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China. shah.fahad@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
  • Ali S; Department of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
  • Bajwa AA; MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
  • Hakeem KR; Department of Arid Land Agriculture, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • Ameen A; The Chinese Institute of Water-saving Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
  • Amanullah; Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, QLD, Toowoomba, 4350, Australia.
  • Rehman HU; Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alghabar F; College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Jatoi GH; Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, 25130, Pakistan.
  • Akram M; Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Khan A; Department of Arid Land Agriculture, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
  • Islam F; Department of Plant Pathology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Hydrabad, Sindh, Pakistan.
  • Ata-Ul-Karim ST; Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, Pakistan.
  • Rehmani MIA; College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
  • Hussain S; Institute of Crop Science and Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Crop Germpalsm, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
  • Razaq M; National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, People's Republic of China.
  • Fathi A; Department of Agronomy, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 24(6): 5811-5823, 2017 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28054268
ABSTRACT
Crop nutrient management is an essential component of any cropping system. With increasing concerns over environmental protection, improvement in fertilizer use efficiencies has become a prime goal in global agriculture system. Phosphorus (P) is one of the most important nutrients, and strategies are required to optimize its use in important arable crops like cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) that has great significance. Sustainable P use in crop production could significantly avoid environmental hazards resulting from over-P fertilization. Crop growth modeling has emerged as an effective tool to assess and predict the optimal nutrient requirements for different crops. In present study, Decision Support System for Agro-technology Transfer (DSSAT) sub-model CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton-P was evaluated to estimate the observed and simulated P use in two cotton cultivars grown at three P application rates under the semi-arid climate of southern Punjab, Pakistan. The results revealed that both the cultivars performed best at medium rate of P application (57 kg ha-1) in terms of days to anthesis, days to maturity, seed cotton yield, total dry matter production, and harvest index during 2013 and 2014. Cultivar FH-142 performed better than MNH-886 in terms of different yield components. There was a good agreement between observed and simulated days to anthesis (0 to 1 day), days to maturity (0 to 2 days), seed cotton yield, total dry matter, and harvest index with an error of -4.4 to 15%, 12-7.5%, and 13-9.5% in MNH-886 and for FH-142, 4-16%, 19-11%, and 16-8.3% for growing years 2013 and 2014, respectively. CROPGRO-Cotton-P would be a useful tool to forecast cotton yield under different levels of P in cotton production system of the semi-arid climate of Southern Punjab.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fósforo / Gossypium / Clima Desértico / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fósforo / Gossypium / Clima Desértico / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article