Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
Helal, Maha H; Mansour, Sahar M; Zaglol, Mai; Salaleldin, Lamia A; Nada, Omniya M; Haggag, Marwa A.
Afiliação
  • Helal MH; 1 Women's Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Mansour SM; 2 Women's Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, Kasr El Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Zaglol M; 1 Women's Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Salaleldin LA; 2 Women's Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, Kasr El Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Nada OM; 1 Women's Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Haggag MA; 1 Women's Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
Br J Radiol ; 90(1071): 20160717, 2017 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28055247
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To study the role of advanced applications of digital mammogram, whether contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), in the "T" staging of histologically proven breast cancer before planning for treatment management.

METHODS:

In this prospective analysis, we evaluated 98 proved malignant breast masses regarding their size, multiplicity and the presence of associated clusters of microcalcifications. Evaluation methods included digital mammography (DM), 3D tomosynthesis and CESM. Traditional DM was first performed then in a period of 10-14-day interval; breast tomosynthesis and contrast-based mammography were performed for the involved breast only. Views at tomosynthesis were acquired in a "step-and-shoot" tube motion mode to produce multiple (11-15), low-dose images and in contrast-enhanced study, low-energy (22-33 kVp) and high-energy (44-49 kVp) exposures were taken after the i.v. injection of the contrast agent. Operative data were the gold standard reference.

RESULTS:

Breast tomosynthesis showed the highest accuracy in size assessment (n = 69, 70.4%) than contrast-enhanced (n = 49, 50%) and regular mammography (n = 59, 60.2%). Contrast-enhanced mammography presented the least performance in assessing calcifications, yet it was most sensitive in the detection of multiplicity (92.3%), followed by tomosynthesis (77%) and regular mammography (53.8%). The combined analysis of the three modalities provided an accuracy of 74% in the "T" staging of breast cancer.

CONCLUSION:

The combined application of tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammogram enhanced the performance of the traditional DM and presented an informative method in the staging of breast cancer. Advances in knowledge Staging and management planning of breast cancer can divert according to tumour size, multiplicity and the presence of microcalcifications. DBT shows sharp outlines of the tumour with no overlap tissue and spots microcalcifications. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammogram shows the extent of abnormal contrast uptake and detects multiplicity. Integrated analysis provides optimal findings for proper "T" staging of breast cancer.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia / Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia / Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article