Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Should patients older than 65 years be offered a second kidney transplant?
Heldal, Kristian; Hartmann, Anders; Lønning, Kjersti; Leivestad, Torbjørn; Reisæter, Anna V; Line, Pål-Dag; Holdaas, Hallvard; Midtvedt, Karsten.
Afiliação
  • Heldal K; Department of Cardiology, Nephrology, Endocrinology and Geriatrics, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Telemark Hospital Trust, N-3710, Skien, Norway. kristian.heldal@sthf.no.
  • Hartmann A; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. kristian.heldal@sthf.no.
  • Lønning K; Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
  • Leivestad T; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Reisæter AV; Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
  • Line PD; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Holdaas H; Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
  • Midtvedt K; Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Nephrol ; 18(1): 13, 2017 Jan 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28077080
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Age and number of recipients in need of kidney re-transplantation are increasing. Re-transplantation practices and outcomes in elderly recipients are not previously explored. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of recipients 65 years and older receiving their second deceased donor allograft.

METHODS:

The study was designed as a retrospective registry based study. All recipients 65 years or older who received a deceased donor kidney transplant at Oslo University Hospital between 2000 and 2014 were included in the study. Survival outcomes were compared between recipients of first (TX1) and second (TX2) allograft. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models with patient survival, uncensored graft survival and death-censored graft survival as outcomes in the analyses.

RESULTS:

Seven hundred and thirty-tree recipients > 65 years received a first (n = 687) or second (n = 46) deceased donor kidney transplant. Five years uncensored graft survival rates were 64% in TX 2 and 67% in TX 1 (P= 0.789). Estimated five years graft survival rates censored for death with functioning graft were 88% in TX2 and 90% in TX1 (P=0.475). Adjusted hazard ratio for uncensored graft loss (TX2 vs. TX1) was 1.24 (95% CI 0.77 - 2.00). Adjusted hazard ratio for graft loss censored for death with functioning graft (TX2 vs. TX1) was 1.70 (0.72-4.02).

CONCLUSIONS:

Older recipients of second transplants have outcomes that are comparable to the outcomes of age-matched first transplant recipients, and far better than previously documented for older transplant candidates remaining on dialysis treatment. Advanced age by itself should not be a contraindication for re-transplantation. Best results are achieved with short time on dialysis before re-transplantation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Transplante de Rim / Rejeição de Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Transplante de Rim / Rejeição de Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article