Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Enhanced Recovery the New Standard of Care in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction?
Afonso, Anoushka; Oskar, Sabine; Tan, Kay See; Disa, Joseph J; Mehrara, Babak J; Ceyhan, Jihan; Dayan, Joseph H.
Afiliação
  • Afonso A; New York, N.Y.
  • Oskar S; From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Tan KS; New York, N.Y.
  • Disa JJ; From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Mehrara BJ; New York, N.Y.
  • Ceyhan J; From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Dayan JH; New York, N.Y.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 139(5): 1053-1061, 2017 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28092334
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

At present, there are limited data available regarding the use and feasibility of enhanced recovery pathways for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction. The authors sought to assess patient outcomes before and after the introduction of an enhanced recovery pathway that was adopted at a single cancer center.

METHODS:

A multidisciplinary enhanced recovery pathway was developed for patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator or free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Core elements of the enhanced recovery pathway included substituting intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with ketorolac and transversus abdominis plane blocks using liposomal bupivacaine, as well as intraoperative goal-directed fluid management. Patients who underwent surgery between April and August of 2015 using the enhanced recovery pathway were compared with a historical control cohort. The primary endpoints were hospital length of stay and total postoperative opioid consumption.

RESULTS:

In total, 91 consecutive patients were analyzed (enhanced recovery pathway, n = 42; pre-enhanced recovery pathway, n = 49). Mean hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the enhanced recovery pathway group than in the pre-enhanced recovery pathway group (4.0 days versus 5.0 days; p < 0.0001). Total postoperative morphine equivalent consumption was also lower in the enhanced recovery pathway group (46.0 mg versus 70.5 mg; p = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of 30-day complications between the groups (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSION:

The adoption of an enhanced recovery pathway for deep inferior epigastric perforator and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction by multiple surgeons significantly decreased opioid consumption and reduced length of stay by 1 day. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Pós-Operatórios / Retalhos Cirúrgicos / Mamoplastia / Padrão de Cuidado / Microcirurgia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Pós-Operatórios / Retalhos Cirúrgicos / Mamoplastia / Padrão de Cuidado / Microcirurgia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article