Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence and management status of urologic diseases in geriatric hospitals in South Korea: A field research.
Lee, Sang Heon; Suh, Jungyo; Kim, Hyung Suk; Lee, Young Ju; Lee, Sang Rim; Kim, Khae Hawn; Jeong, Chang Wook.
Afiliação
  • Lee SH; Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Suh J; Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim HS; Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • Lee YJ; Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee SR; Community Nursing Science, Seoul National University College of Nursing, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim KH; Department of Urology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
  • Jeong CW; Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Investig Clin Urol ; 58(1): 70-76, 2017 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097271
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We aimed to investigate the current management status of urologic diseases in geriatric hospitals in South Korea. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Questionnaire surveys and in-depth person-to-person interviews were conducted at 13 hospitals within the Seoul and Incheon areas.

RESULTS:

The study was carried out from July to December 2014; 75.6% of patients (1,858/2,458) and 77.5% (779/1,031) of medical personnel responded to our survey. All surveys and interviews were performed by urology specialists, fellows, residents, or nurses. The hospitals included in the study had an average of 215.2 beds (range, 110-367), 189.1 patients (range, 90-345), and 40.2 nurses (range, 10-83). The average number of physicians was 6.2 (range, 3-11), but none of these were certified urologists. Only 4 hospitals provided consultation services for urological disorders. In total, 64% of patients had urological disorders, although only 20.7% of patients were receiving medication. Most patients were being treated using urological interventions; diapers (49.7%), indwelling catheters (19.5%), clean intermittent catheters (12.2%), and external collection urinary drainage (7.9%). However, most interventions were inadequately implemented, and only 17% of the patients had been examined by a certified urologist. Urological complications were found in 20.2% of patients, and secondary complications occurred in 18.8%. Excluding redundant cases, the total prevalence of urological complications was 39.0%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Urologic diseases are poorly managed, and no certified urologists work in geriatric hospitals. Therefore, more designated urologists are needed in geriatric hospitals.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Urológicas / Geriatria / Hospitais Especializados Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Urológicas / Geriatria / Hospitais Especializados Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article