Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide administered via nebulizer: a randomized controlled trial in patients with severe persistent asthma.
Lin, Jiangtao; Chen, Ping; Liu, Chuntao; Kang, Jian; Xiao, Wei; Chen, Zhengxian; Tang, Huaping; Du, Xin; Liu, Cindy; Luo, Linda.
Afiliação
  • Lin J; China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Chen P; General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang 110000, China.
  • Liu C; West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Kang J; The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.
  • Xiao W; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
  • Chen Z; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou 510080, China.
  • Tang H; Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China.
  • Du X; GlaxoSmithKline (China) R&D Co., Ltd, Beijing 100025, China.
  • Liu C; GlaxoSmithKline (China) R&D Co., Ltd, Beijing 100025, China.
  • Luo L; GlaxoSmithKline (China) R&D Co., Ltd, Beijing 100025, China.
J Thorac Dis ; 9(2): 372-385, 2017 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28275486
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study compared the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) inhalation n solution with budesonide (BUD) suspension for inhalation administered via nebulizer, in Chinese adult patients with severe, persistent asthma.

METHODS:

This was a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, single-blind, parallel-group study, conducted at 26 clinical sites in China. Participants were randomized 11 to FP nebules 1 mg twice daily or BUD 2 mg twice daily via nebulizer for 12 weeks.

RESULTS:

A total of 317 adult patients were randomized. The primary endpoint was mean change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over weeks 1-12 from baseline, and analyzed in the ITT (n=315) and PP populations (n=283). Week 12 PEF increase from baseline was 26.7 L/min (14.1%) and 28.0 L/min (15.3%) in the ITT population, and 29.1 L/min (15.7%) and 30.1 L/min (16.2%) in the PP population, in the FP and BUD groups, respectively; all improvements were of clinical significance. Lower limits of the two-sided 95% CIs for the least squares (LS) mean treatment difference (FP minus BUD) were -12.19 L/min (ITT) and -12.95 L/min (PP), both above the pre-specified non-inferiority criteria -12.00 L/min and not clinically meaningful. There was no significant difference in the week 12 mean FEV1 increase between the FP and BUD groups (0.237 L/16.79% vs. 0.236 L/17.73%). Lower limits of the 95% CIs for LS mean treatment difference in morning PEF change from baseline over weeks 1-4 in a post hoc analysis were -10.41 and -11.96 L/min in the ITT and PP populations respectively; both above -12.00 L/min. A review of safety data indicated that rates of AEs, SAEs, and drug-related AEs were similar between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The 12-week treatment of FP inhalation solution administered via nebulizer is safe and effectively for treating severe, persistent asthma in Chinese patients over 12 week.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article