Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression levels do not differ between lobular and ductal carcinoma in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors.
Truin, Wilfred; Roumen, Rudi M H; Siesling, Sabine; van de Vijver, Koen K; Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C G; Voogd, Adri C.
Afiliação
  • Truin W; Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Roumen RMH; Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Siesling S; Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van de Vijver KK; Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Voogd AC; Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 164(1): 133-138, 2017 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28365833
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Differences in estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) expression between invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) could be an underlying reason for the difference in chemo-sensitivity and response to hormonal therapy between ILC and IDC. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in ER and PR expression levels between postmenopausal patients with hormonal receptor-positive ILC and IDC.

METHODS:

We included all ER and/or PR receptor-positive ILC and IDC, diagnosed between January 2011 and December 2013 from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. A semi-quantitative classification was used to analyze differences in ER/PR expression, which consisted of three ER expression classes 10-69, 70-89, and ≥90%. Differences in ER and PR expression levels between IDC and ILC were analyzed according to age group, tumor size, axillary nodal status, grade, and HER2 status.

RESULTS:

In total, 26,339 ER and/or PR-positive breast cancers were included in the study, of which 17% were ILC and 83% IDC. In patients with IDC, 86% of the tumors showed an ER expression level of 90% or more, compared to 84% in those with ILC. In both IDC and ILC a PR expression level of 90% or more was observed in 54% of the tumors. In postmenopausal patients aged 50-69 years no significant differences could be observed in ER and PR expression levels between ILC and IDC.

CONCLUSION:

Patients with ER and PR-positive ILC and IDC have similar quantitative ER and PR expression profiles, implicating that ER/PR expression is unlikely to be a confounding factor in studies concerning chemo-sensitivity of ILC and IDC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Receptores de Progesterona / Receptores de Estrogênio / Carcinoma Lobular / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Receptores de Progesterona / Receptores de Estrogênio / Carcinoma Lobular / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article