Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Fecal Diversion Needed in Pelvic Anastomoses During Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)?
Whealon, Matthew D; Gahagan, John V; Sujatha-Bhaskar, Sarath; O'Leary, Michael P; Selleck, Matthew; Dumitra, Sinziana; Lee, Byrne; Senthil, Maheswari; Pigazzi, Alessio.
Afiliação
  • Whealon MD; Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Gahagan JV; Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
  • O'Leary MP; Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Selleck M; Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
  • Dumitra S; Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Lee B; Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Senthil M; Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
  • Pigazzi A; Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA. apigazzi@uci.edu.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(8): 2122-2128, 2017 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28411306
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The role of fecal diversion with pelvic anastomosis during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is not well defined.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC between 2009 and 2016 was performed to identify those with a pelvic anastomosis (colorectal, ileorectal, or coloanal anastomosis).

RESULTS:

The study identified 73 patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC at three different institutions between July 2009 and June of 2016. Of these patients, 32 (44%) underwent a primary anastomosis with a diverting ileostomy, whereas 41 (56%) underwent a primary anastomosis without fecal diversion. The anastomotic leak rate for the no-diversion group was 22% compared with 0% for the group with a diverting ileostomy (p < 0.01). The 90-day mortality rate for the no-diversion group was 7.1%. The hospital stay was 14.1 ± 8.0 days in the diversion group compared with 17.9 ± 12.5 days in the no-diversion group (p = 0.12). Of those patients with a diverting ileostomy, 68% (n = 22) had their bowel continuity restored, 18% of which required a laparotomy for reversal. Postoperative complications occurred for 50% of those who required a laparotomy and for 44% of those who did not require a laparotomy (p = 0.84).

CONCLUSION:

Diverting ileostomies in patients with a pelvic anastomosis undergoing CRS and HIPEC are associated with a significantly reduced anastomotic leak rate. Reversal of the diverting ileostomy in this patient population required a laparotomy in 18% of the cases and had an associated morbidity rate of 50%.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pelve / Neoplasias Peritoneais / Anastomose Cirúrgica / Neoplasias Colorretais / Incontinência Fecal / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução / Hipertermia Induzida Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pelve / Neoplasias Peritoneais / Anastomose Cirúrgica / Neoplasias Colorretais / Incontinência Fecal / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução / Hipertermia Induzida Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article