Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison Between Unilateral and Bilateral Plyometric Training on Single- and Double-Leg Jumping Performance and Strength.
Bogdanis, Gregory C; Tsoukos, Athanasios; Kaloheri, Olga; Terzis, Gerasimos; Veligekas, Panagiotis; Brown, Lee E.
Afiliação
  • Bogdanis GC; School of P. E. and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Tsoukos A; School of P. E. and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Kaloheri O; School of P. E. and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Terzis G; School of P. E. and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Veligekas P; School of P. E. and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Brown LE; Human Performance Laboratory, California State University, Fullerton, California.
J Strength Cond Res ; 33(3): 633-640, 2019 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28445230
ABSTRACT
Bogdanis, GC, Tsoukos, A, Kaloheri, O, Terzis, G, Veligekas, P, and Brown, LE. Comparison between unilateral and bilateral plyometric training on single- and double-leg jumping performance and strength. J Strength Cond Res 33(3) 633-640, 2019-This study compared the effects of unilateral and bilateral plyometric training on single- and double-leg jumping performance, maximal strength, and rate of force development (RFD). Fifteen moderately trained subjects were randomly assigned to either a unilateral (U, n = 7) or bilateral group (B, n = 8). Both groups performed maximal effort plyometric leg exercises 2 times per week for 6 weeks. The B group performed all exercises with both legs, whereas the U group performed half the repetitions with each leg, so that total exercise volume was the same. Jumping performance was assessed by countermovement jumps (CMJs) and drop jumps (DJs), whereas maximal isometric leg press strength and RFD were measured before and after training for each leg separately and both legs together. Countermovement jump improvement with both legs was not significantly different between U (12.1 ± 7.2%) and B (11.0 ± 5.5%) groups. However, the sum of right- and left-leg CMJ only improved in the U group (19.0 ± 7.1%, p < 0.001) and was unchanged in the B group (3.4 ± 8.4%, p = 0.80). Maximal isometric leg press force with both legs was increased similarly between groups (B 20.1 ± 6.5%, U 19.9 ± 6.2%). However, the sum of right- and left-leg maximal force increased more in U compared with B group (23.8 ± 9.1% vs. 11.9 ± 6.2%, p = 0.009, respectively). Similarly, the sum of right- and left-leg RFD0-50 and RFD0-100 were improved only in the U group (34-36%, p < 0.01). Unilateral plyometric training was more effective at increasing both single- and double-leg jumping performance, isometric leg press maximal force, and RFD when compared with bilateral training.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Força Muscular / Exercício Pliométrico / Movimento Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Força Muscular / Exercício Pliométrico / Movimento Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article