Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty Between an Orthopedic Specialty Hospital and General Hospital.
Padegimas, Eric M; Kreitz, Tyler M; Zmistowski, Benjamin M; Girden, Alexander J; Hozack, William J; Chen, Antonia F.
Afiliação
  • Padegimas EM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Kreitz TM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Zmistowski BM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Girden AJ; Sidney-Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Hozack WJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Chen AF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Arthroplasty ; 32(8): 2347-2352, 2017 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28449845
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) at an orthopedic specialty hospital (OSH) and a general hospital (GH).

METHODS:

A retrospective study of all primary THAs was performed at an OSH and GH in 2014. A cohort of GH patients was manually matched to the OSH by clinical and demographic variables blinded to outcome. These matched groups were then unblinded and compared by length of stay (LOS), 90-day readmissions, mortality, reoperations, and inpatient rehabilitation utilization.

RESULTS:

The 329 THAs at the OSH were matched with 329 THAs at the GH. Average LOS for THA at the OSH was 1.10 ± 0.51 days compared with 1.27 ± 0.93 (P = .004) at the GH. There were 2 OSH readmissions vs 5 GH readmissions (P = .25). There were 3 OSH reoperations vs 4 GH reoperations (P = .70). There were no mortalities. Three OSH patients used inpatient rehabilitation vs 13 GH patients (P = .011). When GH outlier and rehabilitation patients were excluded, the difference in LOS was not significant (1.08 ± 0.47 vs 1.13 ± 0.55 days; t = 1.331; P = .184). Two OSH patients required transfer to a GH postoperatively (angina and gastrointestinal bleed).

CONCLUSION:

This study found that perioperative outcomes for THA were equally good at the OSH and GH. Rehabilitation utilization was higher at the GH. The LOS at both facilities was lower than the national average of 2.9 days. When rehabilitation patients and outliers were excluded, there was no significant difference in LOS between the two.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Readmissão do Paciente / Artroplastia de Quadril / Hospitais Gerais / Hospitais Especializados / Tempo de Internação Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Readmissão do Paciente / Artroplastia de Quadril / Hospitais Gerais / Hospitais Especializados / Tempo de Internação Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article