Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Upper esophageal sphincter abnormalities and high-resolution esophageal manometry findings in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.
Benjamin, Tanmayee; Zackria, Shamiq; Lopez, Rocio; Richter, Joel; Thota, Prashanthi N.
Afiliação
  • Benjamin T; a Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Swallowing and Motility Disorders , Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , OH , USA.
  • Zackria S; a Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Swallowing and Motility Disorders , Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , OH , USA.
  • Lopez R; b Department of Biostatistics , Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , OH , USA.
  • Richter J; c Joy Culverhouse Center for Swallowing Disorders, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition , University of South Florida College of Medicine , Tampa , FL , USA.
  • Thota PN; a Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Swallowing and Motility Disorders , Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , OH , USA.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 52(8): 816-821, 2017 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28471304
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The association between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and abnormalities of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and esophageal motility is not clearly known. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) has allowed accurate measurement and evaluation of UES and esophageal function. GOALS To evaluate the UES function and esophageal motility using HREM in patients with LPR and compare them to patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). STUDY All patients evaluated for GERD or LPR symptoms with esophageal function testing including HREM, ambulatory distal pH monitoring and upper endoscopy between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively studied (n = 220). The study group (group A, n = 57) consisted of patients diagnosed with LPR after comprehensive evaluation. They were compared to patients who had typical GERD symptoms only (group B, n = 98) and patients with both GERD and LPR symptoms (group C, n = 65).

RESULTS:

Abnormalities in UES pressures and relaxation were found in about one-third of patients in all groups. There were no significant differences between the groups. Group B had higher prevalence of abnormal esophageal motility compared to others (group A vs. B vs. C = 20.8% vs. 28% vs. 12.5%, p = .029). Group B patients also had higher prevalence of Barrett's esophagus compared to others (group A vs. B vs. C = 0% vs.12.2% vs. 4.6%, p = .01). Distal pH testing revealed no significant differences between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Abnormal UES function was noted in one-third of patients with LPR or GERD. However, there were no abnormalities on esophageal function testing specific for LPR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Esfíncter Esofágico Superior / Refluxo Laringofaríngeo / Manometria Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Esfíncter Esofágico Superior / Refluxo Laringofaríngeo / Manometria Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article