Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Follicular flushing in natural cycle IVF does not affect the luteal phase - a prospective controlled study.
von Wolff, M; Kohl Schwartz, A; Stute, P; Fäh, M; Otti, G; Schürch, R; Rohner, S.
Afiliação
  • von Wolff M; University Women's Hospital, Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Berne, Switzerland. Electronic address: Michael.vonWolff@insel.ch.
  • Kohl Schwartz A; University Women's Hospital, Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Berne, Switzerland.
  • Stute P; University Women's Hospital, Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Berne, Switzerland.
  • Fäh M; University Women's Hospital, Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Berne, Switzerland.
  • Otti G; University Women's Hospital, Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Berne, Switzerland.
  • Schürch R; CTU Berne, Department of Clinical Research, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
  • Rohner S; University Women's Hospital, Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Berne, Switzerland.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 35(1): 37-41, 2017 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28483339
ABSTRACT
In contrast to multifollicular IVF, follicular flushing seems to increase the efficacy of monofollicular IVF treatments such as natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF). However, because follicular flushing causes loss of granulosa cells, it might negatively affect luteal phase length and endocrine function of the luteal body. A prospective cohort Phase II study was performed in 24 women undergoing NC-IVF. Women underwent a reference cycle with human chorionic gonadotrophin-induced ovulation without follicle aspiration and analysis of the length of the luteal phase and luteal concentrations of progesterone and oestradiol. In addition, they underwent a NC-IVF cycle which was performed identically but follicles were aspirated and flushed three times. The luteal phase was shorter in 29.2%, equal in 16.7% and longer in 50.0% of cases following flushing of the follicles. Overall, neither difference in luteal phase length was significant [median duration (interquartile range) in reference cycle 13 (12; 14.5), IVF (flushing) cycle 14 (12.5; 14.5), median difference (95% CI) 0.5 (-0.5 to 1.5)] nor median progesterone and oestradiol concentrations. In conclusion, follicular flushing in NC-IVF affects neither the length of the luteal phase nor the luteal phase concentrations of progesterone and oestradiol, questioning the need for luteal phase supplementation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Progesterona / Estradiol / Recuperação de Oócitos / Folículo Ovariano / Fase Luteal Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Progesterona / Estradiol / Recuperação de Oócitos / Folículo Ovariano / Fase Luteal Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article