Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Testing the Effectiveness of a Primary Care Intervention to Improve Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.
Dodd, Natalie; Carey, Mariko Leanne; Mansfield, Elise; Oldmeadow, Christopher.
Afiliação
  • Dodd N; University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Callaghan, Australia.
  • Carey ML; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
  • Mansfield E; University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Callaghan, Australia.
  • Oldmeadow C; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 6(5): e86, 2017 May 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28490420
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) significantly reduces mortality associated with this disease. In Australia, the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program provides regular fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) for those aged 50 to 74 years, however, participation rates in the program have plateaued at 36%. Given low uptake in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program, it is necessary to explore alternate methods to increase CRC screening rates. Primary care is a promising adjunct setting to test methods to increase CRC screening participation. Primary care guidelines support the recommendation and provision of CRC screening to primary care patients. Those in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program target age range frequently present to their primary care provider.

OBJECTIVE:

This study tests the effect that a multicomponent primary care-based intervention has on CRC screening uptake when compared to usual care.

METHODS:

Primary care patients presenting for an appointment with their primary care provider complete a touchscreen survey to determine eligibility for the trial. Those aged 50 to 74 years, at average risk of CRC, with no history of CRC or inflammatory bowel disease, who have not had an FOBT in the past 2 years or a colonoscopy in the past 5 years are eligible to participate in the trial. Trial participants are randomized to the intervention or usual care group by day of attendance at the practice. The intervention consists of provision of an FOBT, printed information sheet, and primary care provider endorsement to complete the FOBT. The usual care group receives no additional care.

RESULTS:

The primary outcome is completion of CRC screening 6 weeks after recruitment. The proportion of patients completing CRC screening will be compared between trial groups using a logistic regression model.

CONCLUSIONS:

CRC screening rates in Australia are suboptimal and interventions to increase screening participation are urgently required. This protocol describes the process of implementing a multicomponent intervention designed to increase CRC screening uptake in a primary care setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001299493; https//anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371136&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http//www.webcitation.org/6pL0VYIj6). Universal Trial Number U1111-1185-6120.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article