Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis.
Yun, Seong Jong; Ryu, Chang-Woo; Rhee, Sun Jung; Ryu, Jung Kyu; Oh, Ji Young.
Afiliação
  • Yun SJ; Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-701, Republic of Korea.
  • Ryu CW; Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea. md.cwryu@gmail.com.
  • Rhee SJ; Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea.
  • Ryu JK; Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea.
  • Oh JY; Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 164(3): 557-569, 2017 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28516226
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We evaluated the benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared to FFDM alone for breast cancer detection, focusing on cancer characteristics.

METHODS:

We searched electronic databases and relevant references for published studies comparing DBT plus FFDM to FFDM alone for breast cancer screening. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) for various pathologic findings were determined using random effects models.

RESULTS:

Eleven eligible studies were included. Pooled RRs showed a greater cancer detection for DBT plus FFDM than for FFDM alone for invasive cancer (1.327; 95% CI, 1.168-1.508), stage T1 (1.388; 95% CI, 1.137-1.695), nodal-negative (1.451; 95% CI, 1.209-1.742), all histologic grades (grade I, 1.812; grade II/III, 1.403), and histologic types of invasive cancer (ductal, 1.437; lobular, 1.901). However, adding DBT did not increase for detection of carcinoma in situ (1.198; 95% CI, 0.942-1.524), stage ≥T2 (1.391; 95% CI, 0.895-2.163), or nodal-positive cancer (1.336; 95% CI, 0.921-1.938). Heterogeneity among studies was not significant in any subset analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Adding DBT to FFDM enabled detection of early invasive breast cancer that might have been missed with FFDM alone. Knowing which cancer characteristic DBT detects may allow it to play a complementary role in predicting long-term patient outcomes and facilitate treatment planning.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article