Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rapid Tests for Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bruning, Andrea H L; Leeflang, Mariska M G; Vos, Johanna M B W; Spijker, Rene; de Jong, Menno D; Wolthers, Katja C; Pajkrt, Dasja.
Afiliação
  • Bruning AHL; Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital.
  • Leeflang MMG; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics.
  • Vos JMBW; Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital.
  • Spijker R; Medical Library.
  • de Jong MD; Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Wolthers KC; Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Pajkrt D; Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital.
Clin Infect Dis ; 65(6): 1026-1032, 2017 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28520858
ABSTRACT
Rapid diagnosis of respiratory virus infections contributes to patient care. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of rapid tests for the detection of respiratory viruses. We searched Medline and EMBASE for studies evaluating these tests against polymerase chain reaction as the reference standard. Of 179 studies included, 134 evaluated rapid tests for influenza viruses, 32 for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and 13 for other respiratory viruses. We used the bivariate random effects model for quantitative meta-analysis of the results. Most tests detected only influenza viruses or RSV. Summary sensitivity and specificity estimates of tests for influenza were 61.1% and 98.9%. For RSV, summary sensitivity was 75.3%, and specificity, 98.7%. We assessed the quality of studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. Because of incomplete reporting, the risk of bias was often unclear. Despite their intended use at the point of care, 26.3% of tests were evaluated in a laboratory setting. Although newly developed tests seem more sensitive, high-quality evaluations of these tests are lacking.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial / Diagnóstico Precoce / Influenza Humana / Testes Imediatos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial / Diagnóstico Precoce / Influenza Humana / Testes Imediatos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article