Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal Energy Delivery, Rather than the Implementation of a Feeding Protocol, May Benefit Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients.
Wang, Chen-Yu; Huang, Chun-Te; Chen, Chao-Hsiu; Chen, Mei-Fen; Ching, Shiu-Lan; Huang, Yi-Chia.
Afiliação
  • Wang CY; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan. chestmen@gmail.com.
  • Huang CT; Department of Nursing, Hung Kuang University, Taichung 43302, Taiwan. chestmen@gmail.com.
  • Chen CH; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan. Huangchunte@gmail.com.
  • Chen MF; Department of Food and Nutrition, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan. hsiu@vghtc.gov.tw.
  • Ching SL; Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan. zox1120@yahoo.com.tw.
  • Huang YC; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan. slcvgh@gmail.com.
Nutrients ; 9(5)2017 May 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28531142
ABSTRACT
Malnutrition is common in intensive care units (ICU), and volume based feeding protocols have been proposed to increase nutrient delivery. However, the volume based approach compared to trophic feeding has not been proven entirely successful in critically ill patients. Our study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes both before and after the implementation of the feeding protocol, and to also evaluate the effects of total energy delivery on outcomes in these patients. We retrospectively collected all patient data, one year before and after the implementation of the volume-based feeding protocol, in the ICU at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Daily actual energy intake from enteral nutritional support was recorded from the day of ICU admission until either the 7th day of ICU stay, or the day of discharge from the ICU. The energy achievement rate (%) was calculated as (actual energy intake/estimated energy requirement) × 100%. Two-hundred fourteen patients were enrolled before the implementation of the volume-based feeding protocol (pre-FP group), while 198 patients were enrolled after the implementation of the volume-based feeding protocol (FP group). Although patients in the FP group had significantly higher actual energy intakes and achievement rates when compared with the patients in the pre-FP group, there was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups. Comparing survivors and non-survivors from both groups, an energy achievement rate of less than 65% was associated with an increased mortality rate after adjusting for potential confounders (odds ratio, 1.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.47). The implementation of the feeding protocol could improve energy intake for critically ill patients, however it had no beneficial effects on reducing the ICU mortality rate. Receiving at least 65% of their energy requirements is the main key point for improving clinical outcomes in patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ingestão de Energia / Estado Terminal / Nutrição Enteral / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva / Necessidades Nutricionais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ingestão de Energia / Estado Terminal / Nutrição Enteral / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva / Necessidades Nutricionais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article