Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study.
Needham, Dale M; Sepulveda, Kristin A; Dinglas, Victor D; Chessare, Caroline M; Friedman, Lisa Aronson; Bingham, Clifton O; Turnbull, Alison E.
Afiliação
  • Needham DM; 1 Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group.
  • Sepulveda KA; 2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine.
  • Dinglas VD; 3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine.
  • Chessare CM; 1 Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group.
  • Friedman LA; 2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine.
  • Bingham CO; 1 Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group.
  • Turnbull AE; 2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 196(9): 1122-1130, 2017 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28537429
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE Research evaluating acute respiratory failure (ARF) survivors' outcomes after hospital discharge has substantial heterogeneity in terms of the measurement instruments used, creating barriers to synthesizing study data.

OBJECTIVES:

To identify a minimum set of core outcome measures that are essential to include in all clinical research studies evaluating ARF survivors after discharge.

METHODS:

We conducted a three-round modified Delphi consensus process with 77 participants (47% female, 55% outside the United States), including clinical researchers from more than 16 countries across six continents, patients/caregivers, clinicians, and research funders. Participants reviewed standardized information on measure instruments for seven consensus-derived outcomes plus one recommended outcome. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Response rates were 91 to 97% across the three rounds. Among 75 measurement instruments evaluated, the following met a priori consensus criteria EQ-5D and 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (optional) for the "satisfaction with life and personal enjoyment" and "pain" outcomes, and both the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised for the "mental health" outcome. No measures reached consensus for the following

outcomes:

cognition, muscle and/or nerve function, physical function, and pulmonary function. All measures considered for pulmonary function met consensus criteria for exclusion. The following measures did not reach the threshold for consensus but achieved the highest scores for their respective

outcomes:

the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (cognition), manual muscle testing and handgrip dynamometry (muscle and/or nerve function), and 6-minute-walk test (physical function).

CONCLUSIONS:

This Core Outcome Measurement Set is recommended for use in all clinical research evaluating ARF survivors after hospital discharge. In the future, researchers should evaluate measures for outcomes not reaching consensus.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / Técnica Delphi / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Sobreviventes / Pesquisa Biomédica Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / Técnica Delphi / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Sobreviventes / Pesquisa Biomédica Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article