Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of Leadless Pacemaker in Japanese Patients vs. Rest of the World - Results From a Global Clinical Trial.
Soejima, Kyoko; Asano, Taku; Ishikawa, Toshiyuki; Kusano, Kengo; Sato, Toshiaki; Okamura, Hideo; Matsumoto, Katsumi; Taguchi, Wataru; Stromberg, Kurt; Lande, Jeff; Kobayashi, Youichi.
Afiliação
  • Soejima K; Department of Cardiology, Kyorin University Hospital.
  • Asano T; Department of Cardiology, Showa University Hospital.
  • Ishikawa T; Department of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Hospital.
  • Kusano K; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
  • Sato T; Department of Cardiology, Kyorin University Hospital.
  • Okamura H; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
  • Matsumoto K; Department of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Hospital.
  • Taguchi W; Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd.
  • Stromberg K; Institute for Medical Regulatory Science, Waseda University.
  • Lande J; Medtronic plc.
  • Kobayashi Y; Medtronic plc.
Circ J ; 81(11): 1589-1595, 2017 Oct 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28566657
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A global study designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a transcatheter pacing system included 38 Japanese patients enrolled at 4 sites. Subgroup analysis to evaluate the performance of the leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system in Japanese patients was performed.Methods and 

Results:

Safety and efficacy outcomes, patient and implant procedure characteristics, and patient and physician acceptability from the Japanese population were compared with those from outside Japan. Differences in patient characteristics, implant procedure characteristics and patient acceptability were observed. There were no major complications in Japanese patients and pacing thresholds remained low and stable throughout follow-up. There were no observable differences between Japanese patients and patients from outside Japan in the freedom from major complication rate at 12-months post-implant (100.0% vs. 95.7%, P=0.211) or physician acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although some differences in specific baseline characteristics, such as body size and pacing indication, and in implant procedure characteristics, including anticoagulation strategy and hospitalization period, were observed in the Japanese patients, transcatheter pacemaker performance was similar to that in the global trial. (Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02004873.).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Desenho de Equipamento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Desenho de Equipamento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article