Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early Versus Late Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; Romano, Thiago Gomes; Mendes, Pedro Vitale; Gallo, Cesar Albuquerque; Zampieri, Fernando Godinho; Nassar, Antonio Paulo; Park, Marcelo.
Afiliação
  • Besen BAMP; 1 Intensive Care Unit, Emergency department, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Romano TG; 2 Intensive Care Unit, Hospital da Luz, Amil, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Mendes PV; 3 Nephrology Department, ABC Medical School, Santo Andre, Brazil.
  • Gallo CA; 4 Research Institute, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Zampieri FG; 1 Intensive Care Unit, Emergency department, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Nassar AP; 4 Research Institute, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Park M; 1 Intensive Care Unit, Emergency department, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Intensive Care Med ; 34(9): 714-722, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28569129
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Early initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) effect on survival and renal recovery of critically ill patients is still uncertain. We aimed to systematically review current evidence comparing outcomes of early versus late initiation of RRT in critically ill patients.

METHODS:

We searched the Medline (via Pubmed), LILACS, Science Direct, and CENTRAL databases from inception until November 2016 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing early versus late initiation of RRT in critically ill patients. The primary outcome was mortality. Duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and renal function recovery were secondary outcomes. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were used for the primary outcome.

RESULTS:

Sixty-two studies were retrieved and analyzed, including 11 RCTs. There was no difference in mortality between early and late initiation of RRT among RCTs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-1.19; I2 = 63.1%). Trial sequential analysis of mortality across all RCTs achieved futility boundaries at both 1% and 5% type I error rates, although a subgroup analysis of studies including only acute kidney injury patients was not conclusive. There was also no difference in time on mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital LOS, or renal recovery among studies. Early initiation of RRT was associated with reduced mortality among prospective (OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.96; I2 = 85.9%) and retrospective (OR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.92; I2 = 90.9%) observational studies, both with substantial heterogeneity. However, subgroup analysis excluding low-quality observational studies did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSION:

Pooled analysis of randomized trials indicates early initiation of RRT is not associated with lower mortality rates. The potential benefit of reduced mortality associated with early initiation of RRT was limited to low-quality observational studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Terminal / Terapia de Substituição Renal / Tempo para o Tratamento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado Terminal / Terapia de Substituição Renal / Tempo para o Tratamento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article