Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CDC-reported assisted reproductive technology live-birth rates may mislead the public.
Kushnir, Vitaly A; Choi, Jennifer; Darmon, Sarah K; Albertini, David F; Barad, David H; Gleicher, Norbert.
Afiliação
  • Kushnir VA; The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, USA; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: vkushnir@thechr.com.
  • Choi J; The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, USA; Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Darmon SK; The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, USA.
  • Albertini DF; The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, USA; The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Barad DH; The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, USA; Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Gleicher N; The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, USA; Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vienna School of Medicine, Vienna, Austria; The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 35(2): 161-164, 2017 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28578895
The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publicly reports assisted reproductive technology live-birth rates (LBR) for each US fertility clinic under legal mandate. The 2014 CDC report excluded 35,406 of 184,527 (19.2%) autologous assisted reproductive technology cycles that involved embryo or oocyte banking from LBR calculations. This study calculated 2014 total clinic LBR for all patients utilizing autologous oocytes two ways: including all initiated assisted reproductive technology cycles or excluding banking cycles, as done by the CDC. The main limitation of this analysis is the CDC report did not differentiate between cycles involving long-term banking of embryos or oocytes for fertility preservation from cycles involving short-term embryo banking. Twenty-seven of 458 (6%) clinics reported over 40% of autologous cycles involved banking, collectively performing 12% of all US assisted reproductive technology cycles. LBR in these outlier clinics calculated by the CDC method, was higher than the other 94% of clinics (33.1% versus 31.1%). However, recalculated LBR including banking cycles in the outlier clinics was lower than the other 94% of clinics (15.5% versus 26.6%). LBR calculated by the two methods increasingly diverged based on proportion of banking cycles performed by each clinic reaching 4.5-fold, thereby, potentially misleading the public.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resultado da Gravidez / Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. / Taxa de Gravidez / Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resultado da Gravidez / Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. / Taxa de Gravidez / Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article