Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which MR sequences should we use for the reliable detection and localization of bone marrow edema in spondyloarthritis?
Giraudo, Chiara; Weber, Michael; Puchner, Antonia; Grisar, Johannes; Kainberger, Franz; Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia.
Afiliação
  • Giraudo C; Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  • Weber M; Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  • Puchner A; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Grisar J; Second Department of Internal Medicine with Rheumatology/Osteology and Gastroenterology, KH Barmherzige Schwestern (St. Vincent Hospital), Vienna, Austria.
  • Kainberger F; Karl Landsteiner Institute for Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, St. Pölten, Austria.
  • Schueller-Weidekamm C; Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Radiol Med ; 122(10): 752-760, 2017 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28593478
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the diagnostic confidence in detecting and localizing areas of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joint of patients with suspected spondyloarthritis using a single-plane method and comparing it with multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients with clinical suspicion of spondyloarthritis undergoing an MRI of the sacroiliac joint were included in this retrospective study. To assess sacroiliitis, three methods were applied single-plane (i.e., para-coronal STIR alone), multiplanar unenhanced (i.e., para-coronal STIR and para-axial PD-fs), and multiplanar enhanced method (i.e., para-coronal and para-axial post-contrast T1-fs). Two 4-point scales were used to evaluate, respectively, the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of bone marrow edema. The distribution of certain and uncertain rating according to signal intensity and size of the lesions was also calculated.

RESULTS:

Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Both multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection (p < 0.001) and localization (p < 0.001) of sacroiliitis; no significant difference occurred between the multiplanar unenhanced and enhanced methods (p = 0.405 and p = 1.00, respectively, for detection and localization). A statistically significant difference between the distributions of certain and uncertain rating for detection based on the size and signal intensity of each lesion emerged (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas no statistically significant difference occurred for the confidence of localization (p = 0.452 and p = 0.694, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

The multiplanar methods increased the diagnostic confidence in detection and localization of sacroiliitis. The absence of a significant difference between the proposed unenhanced and enhanced methods suggests that contrast medium is not mandatory for the detection of sacroiliitis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medula Óssea / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Espondilartrite / Edema / Sacroileíte Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medula Óssea / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Espondilartrite / Edema / Sacroileíte Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article