Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multicenter analysis of transanal tube placement for prevention of anastomotic leak after low anterior resection.
Goto, Saori; Hida, Koya; Kawada, Kenji; Okamura, Ryosuke; Hasegawa, Suguru; Kyogoku, Takahisa; Ota, Shuichi; Adachi, Yukito; Sakai, Yoshiharu.
Afiliação
  • Goto S; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Hida K; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Kawada K; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Okamura R; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Hasegawa S; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Kyogoku T; Department of Surgery, Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.
  • Ota S; Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Noe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Adachi Y; Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Noe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Sakai Y; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
J Surg Oncol ; 116(8): 989-995, 2017 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28743178
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication of low anterior resection (LAR). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transanal tube placement for prevention of AL.

METHODS:

This multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled 328 consecutive patients who underwent LAR for rectal cancer at participating hospitals from 2009 to 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS:

A transanal tube was placed in 205 patients (TA group) and not placed in 123 patients (non-TA group). Symptomatic AL occurred in 36 cases (11%), with significantly higher incidence of symptomatic AL in the non-TA group than in the TA group (15% vs 8.3%, odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-4.06). After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariate analysis revealed that placement of a transanal tube could decrease the incidence of symptomatic AL (adjusted OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.15-0.91). There was no significant difference in postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, or local recurrence rate between the two groups. Local recurrence rate tended to be higher in patients with symptomatic AL (3/36) than in those without it (10/292).

CONCLUSIONS:

Transanal tube placement is effective for decreasing the incidence of symptomatic AL after LAR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Canal Anal / Neoplasias Retais / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Canal Anal / Neoplasias Retais / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article