Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the microbiome of healthy and diseased peri-implant sites using Illumina sequencing.
Sanz-Martin, Ignacio; Doolittle-Hall, Janet; Teles, Ricardo P; Patel, Michele; Belibasakis, Georgios N; Hämmerle, Christoph H F; Jung, Ronald E; Teles, Flavia R F.
Afiliação
  • Sanz-Martin I; Section of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Doolittle-Hall J; Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Teles RP; Department of Periodontology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Patel M; Department of Applied Oral Sciences, The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Belibasakis GN; Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hämmerle CHF; Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Jung RE; Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Teles FRF; Department of Periodontology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Clin Periodontol ; 44(12): 1274-1284, 2017 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28766745
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To compare the microbiome of healthy (H) and diseased (P) peri-implant sites and determine the core peri-implant microbiome. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Submucosal biofilms from 32 H and 35 P sites were analysed using 16S rRNA sequencing (MiSeq, Illumina), QIIME and HOMINGS. Differences between groups were determined using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), t tests and Wilcoxon rank sum test and FDR-adjusted. The peri-implant core microbiome was determined.

RESULTS:

PCoA showed partitioning between H and P at all taxonomic levels. Bacteroidetes, Spirochetes and Synergistetes were higher in P, while Actinobacteria prevailed in H (p < .05). Porphyromonas and Treponema were more abundant in P while Rothia and Neisseria were higher in H (p < .05). The core peri-implant microbiome contained Fusobacterium, Parvimonas and Campylobacter sp. T. denticola, and P. gingivalis levels were higher in P, as well as F. alocis, F. fastidiosum and T. maltophilum (p < .05).

CONCLUSION:

The peri-implantitis microbiome is commensal-depleted and pathogen-enriched, harbouring traditional and new pathogens. The core peri-implant microbiome harbours taxa from genera often associated with periodontal inflammation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bactérias / Implantes Dentários / Peri-Implantite / Microbiota Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bactérias / Implantes Dentários / Peri-Implantite / Microbiota Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article