Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of clinical trials.
Kerr, Kathleen F; Roth, Jeremy; Zhu, Kehao; Thiessen-Philbrook, Heather; Meisner, Allison; Wilson, Francis Perry; Coca, Steven; Parikh, Chirag R.
Afiliação
  • Kerr KF; 1 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Roth J; 1 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Zhu K; 1 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Thiessen-Philbrook H; 2 Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine and VA Medical Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Meisner A; 1 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Wilson FP; 2 Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine and VA Medical Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Coca S; 3 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Parikh CR; 2 Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine and VA Medical Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Clin Trials ; 14(6): 629-638, 2017 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28795578
BACKGROUND/AIMS: A potential use of biomarkers is to assist in prognostic enrichment of clinical trials, where only patients at relatively higher risk for an outcome of interest are eligible for the trial. We investigated methods for evaluating biomarkers for prognostic enrichment. METHODS: We identified five key considerations when considering a biomarker and a screening threshold for prognostic enrichment: (1) clinical trial sample size, (2) calendar time to enroll the trial, (3) total patient screening costs and the total per-patient trial costs, (4) generalizability of trial results, and (5) ethical evaluation of trial eligibility criteria. Items (1)-(3) are amenable to quantitative analysis. We developed the Biomarker Prognostic Enrichment Tool for evaluating biomarkers for prognostic enrichment at varying levels of screening stringency. RESULTS: We demonstrate that both modestly prognostic and strongly prognostic biomarkers can improve trial metrics using Biomarker Prognostic Enrichment Tool. Biomarker Prognostic Enrichment Tool is available as a webtool at http://prognosticenrichment.com and as a package for the R statistical computing platform. CONCLUSION: In some clinical settings, even biomarkers with modest prognostic performance can be useful for prognostic enrichment. In addition to the quantitative analysis provided by Biomarker Prognostic Enrichment Tool, investigators must consider the generalizability of trial results and evaluate the ethics of trial eligibility criteria.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores / Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Tamanho da Amostra / Seleção de Pacientes Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores / Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Tamanho da Amostra / Seleção de Pacientes Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article