Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
From habits of attrition to modes of inclusion: enhancing the role of private practitioners in routine disease surveillance.
Phalkey, Revati K; Butsch, Carsten; Belesova, Kristine; Kroll, Marieke; Kraas, Frauke.
Afiliação
  • Phalkey RK; Division of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Nottingham, C111, Clinical Sciences Building 2, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, NG5 1PB Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. revati.phalkey@nottingham.ac.uk.
  • Butsch C; Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. revati.phalkey@nottingham.ac.uk.
  • Belesova K; Institute of Geography, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, D-50923, Cologne, Germany. revati.phalkey@nottingham.ac.uk.
  • Kroll M; Institute of Geography, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, D-50923, Cologne, Germany.
  • Kraas F; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 599, 2017 Aug 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28841872
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Private practitioners are the preferred first point of care in a majority of low and middle-income countries and in this position, best placed for the surveillance of diseases. However their contribution to routine surveillance data is marginal. This systematic review aims to explore evidence with regards to the role, contribution, and involvement of private practitioners in routine disease data notification. We examined the factors that determine the inclusion of, and the participation thereof of private practitioners in disease surveillance activities.

METHODS:

Literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Web of Knowledge, WHOLIS, and WHO-IRIS databases to identify peer-reviewed and gray full-text documents in English with no limits for year of publication or study design. Forty manuscripts were reviewed.

RESULTS:

The current participation of private practitioners in disease surveillance efforts is appalling. The main barriers to their participation are inadequate knowledge leading to unsatisfactory attitudes and misperceptions that influence their practices. Complicated reporting mechanisms with unclear guidelines, along with unsatisfactory attitudes on behalf of the government and surveillance program managers also contribute to the underreporting of cases. Infrastructural barriers especially the availability of computers and skilled human resources are critical to improving private sector participation in routine disease surveillance.

CONCLUSION:

The issues identified are similar to those for underreporting within the Integrated infectious Disease Surveillance and Response systems (IDSR) which collects data mainly from public healthcare facilities. We recommend that surveillance program officers should provide periodic training, supportive supervision and offer regular feedback to the practitioners from both public as well as private sectors in order to improve case notification. Governments need to take leadership and foster collaborative partnerships between the public and private sectors and most importantly exercise regulatory authority where needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Setor Privado / Notificação de Doenças / Vigilância em Saúde Pública Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Setor Privado / Notificação de Doenças / Vigilância em Saúde Pública Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article