Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience.
Inaba, C S; Sujatha-Bhaskar, S; Koh, C Y; Jafari, M D; Mills, S D; Carmichael, J C; Stamos, M J; Pigazzi, A.
Afiliação
  • Inaba CS; Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Koh CY; Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Jafari MD; Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Mills SD; Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Carmichael JC; Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Stamos MJ; Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Pigazzi A; Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA. apigazzi@uci.edu.
Tech Coloproctol ; 21(8): 667-671, 2017 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28871416
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) is an appealing approach for the treatment of rectal prolapse and other conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of RVMR for rectal prolapse.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective chart review for patients who underwent RVMR for rectal prolapse at our institution between July 2012 and May 2016. Any patient who underwent RVMR during this time frame was included in our analysis. Any cases involving colorectal resection or other rectopexy techniques were excluded.

RESULTS:

Of the 24 patients who underwent RVMR, 95.8% of patients were female. Median age was 67.5 years old (IQR 51.5-73.3), and 79.2% of patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class III or IV. Median operative time was 191 min (IQR 164.3-242.5), and median length of stay was 3 days (IQR 2-3). There were no conversions, RVMR-related complications or mortality. Patients were followed for a median of 3.8 (IQR 1.2-15.9) months. Full-thickness recurrence occurred in 3 (12.4%) patients. Rates of fecal incontinence improved after surgery (62.5 vs. 41.5%, respectively) as did constipation (45.8 vs. 33.3%, respectively). No patients reported worsening symptoms postoperatively. Only one (4.2%) patient reported de novo constipation postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS:

RVMR is a feasible, safe and effective option for the treatment of rectal prolapse, with low short-term morbidity and mortality. Multicenter and long-term studies are needed to better assess the benefits of this procedure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telas Cirúrgicas / Prolapso Retal / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telas Cirúrgicas / Prolapso Retal / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article