Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine-learning Support to Individual Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Multimodal MRI and Cognitive Assessments.
De Marco, Matteo; Beltrachini, Leandro; Biancardi, Alberto; Frangi, Alejandro F; Venneri, Annalena.
Afiliação
  • De Marco M; Departments of Neuroscience.
  • Beltrachini L; Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Centre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB).
  • Biancardi A; School of Physics and Astronomy.
  • Frangi AF; School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  • Venneri A; Cardiovascular Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 31(4): 278-286, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28891818
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Understanding whether the cognitive profile of a patient indicates mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or performance levels within normality is often a clinical challenge. The use of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) and machine learning may represent valid aids in clinical settings for the identification of MCI patients.

METHODS:

Machine-learning models were computed to test the classificatory accuracy of cognitive, volumetric [structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI)] and blood oxygen level dependent-connectivity (extracted from RS-fMRI) features, in single-modality and mixed classifiers.

RESULTS:

The best and most significant classifier was the RS-fMRI+Cognitive mixed classifier (94% accuracy), whereas the worst performing was the sMRI classifier (∼80%). The mixed global (sMRI+RS-fMRI+Cognitive) had a slightly lower accuracy (∼90%), although not statistically different from the mixed RS-fMRI+Cognitive classifier. The most important cognitive features were indices of declarative memory and semantic processing. The crucial volumetric feature was the hippocampus. The RS-fMRI features selected by the algorithms were heavily based on the connectivity of mediotemporal, left temporal, and other neocortical regions.

CONCLUSION:

Feature selection was profoundly driven by statistical independence. Some features showed no between-group differences, or showed a trend in either direction. This indicates that clinically relevant brain alterations typical of MCI might be subtle and not inferable from group analysis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Disfunção Cognitiva / Aprendizado de Máquina / Testes Neuropsicológicos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Disfunção Cognitiva / Aprendizado de Máquina / Testes Neuropsicológicos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article