Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Kinetic and kinematic patterns during high intensity clean movement: searching for optimal load.
Ammar, Achraf; Riemann, Bryan L; Masmoudi, Liwa; Blaumann, Marcel; Abdelkarim, Osama; Hökelmann, Anita.
Afiliação
  • Ammar A; a Research Unit: Education, Motricity, Sport and Health, UR15JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax , Sfax University , Sfax , Tunisia.
  • Riemann BL; b Institute of Sport Science , Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg , Magdeburg , Germany.
  • Masmoudi L; c Biodynamics and Human Performance Center , Armstrong State University , Savannah , GA , USA.
  • Blaumann M; a Research Unit: Education, Motricity, Sport and Health, UR15JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax , Sfax University , Sfax , Tunisia.
  • Abdelkarim O; b Institute of Sport Science , Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg , Magdeburg , Germany.
  • Hökelmann A; b Institute of Sport Science , Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg , Magdeburg , Germany.
J Sports Sci ; 36(12): 1319-1330, 2018 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28895467
ABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to investigate loading effects on kinematic and kinetic variables among elite-weightlifters in order to identify an optimal training load to maximize power production for clean-movement. Nine elite-weightlifter (age 24 ± 4years, body-mass 77 ± 6.5kg, height 176 ± 6.1cm and 1RM clean 170 ± 5kg) performed 2 separate repetitions of the clean using 85, 90, 95% and 100%, in a randomized order, while standing on a force platform and being recorded using 3D-capture-system. Differences in kinematics (barbell displacement, velocity and acceleration) and kinetics (power, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), rate of force development (RFD), and work) across the loads were statistically assessed. Results revealed significant load effects for the majority of the studied parameters (p < 0.01) and showed that typical bar-displacement, greatest bar-velocity and peak-power were achieved at 85 and 90% 1RM (p < 0.001). Additionally greater average power was shown for 90 and 95% (p < 0.01) and greater work and vGRF were shown for 90, 95 and 100% than 85% 1RM (p < 0.05). Load had no significant effect on peak-vGRF and peak-RFD (p > 0.05). The results of this study, suggest 90% 1RM to be the most advantageous load to train explosive-force and to enhance power-outputs while maintaining technical efficiency in elite-weightlifters.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Levantamento de Peso / Força Muscular / Desempenho Atlético Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Levantamento de Peso / Força Muscular / Desempenho Atlético Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article