Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patch testing with the European baseline series fragrance markers: a 2016 update.
Ung, C Y; White, J M L; White, I R; Banerjee, P; McFadden, J P.
Afiliação
  • Ung CY; Guy's and St Thomas' University Hospital, St John's Institute of Dermatology, London, U.K.
  • White JML; Guy's and St Thomas' University Hospital, St John's Institute of Dermatology, London, U.K.
  • White IR; Guy's and St Thomas' University Hospital, St John's Institute of Dermatology, London, U.K.
  • Banerjee P; Guy's and St Thomas' University Hospital, St John's Institute of Dermatology, London, U.K.
  • McFadden JP; Guy's and St Thomas' University Hospital, St John's Institute of Dermatology, London, U.K.
Br J Dermatol ; 178(3): 776-780, 2018 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28960261
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Fragrance contact allergy is common and is currently screened for using the following European baseline series fragrance markers fragrance mix (FM)I, FMII, Myroxylon pereirae and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde.

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the validity of patch testing using these fragrance markers in detecting fragrance allergy to 26 individual fragrance substances for which cosmetic ingredient labelling is mandatory within the European Union.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective review of the patch test records of all patients with eczema who underwent testing using the European baseline series, extended with the individual fragrance substances during the period from 2015 to 2016.

RESULTS:

Overall, 359 patients (17·2%) reacted to one or more allergens from the labelled fragrance substance series and/or a fragrance marker from the European baseline series. The allergens that were positive with the greatest frequencies were oxidized linalool [n = 154; 7·4%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6·3-8·6], oxidized limonene (n = 89; 4·3%, 95% CI 3·4-5·2) and Evernia furfuracea (n = 44; 2·1%, 95% CI 1·5-2·8). Of the 319 patients who reacted to any of the labelled fragrance substances, only 130 (40·8%) also reacted to a baseline series fragrance marker. The sensitivity of our history-taking for detecting fragrance allergy was 25·7%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Given the evolving trends in fragrance allergy, patch testing with FMI, FMII, M. pereirae and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde is no longer sufficient for screening for fragrance allergy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Perfumes / Dermatite Alérgica de Contato / Cosméticos / Odorantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Perfumes / Dermatite Alérgica de Contato / Cosméticos / Odorantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article