Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Is it a route for infection in those with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea?
Mercieca, Liam; Pullicino, Richard; Camilleri, Kyra; Abela, Rodianne; Mangion, Sean Apap; Cassar, Julian; Zammit, Matthew; Gatt, Christine; Deguara, Christopher; Barbara, Christopher; Fsadni, Peter; Montefort, Stephen.
Afiliação
  • Mercieca L; Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Pullicino R; Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Camilleri K; Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Abela R; Bacteriology Laboratory, Pathology Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Mangion SA; Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Cassar J; Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Zammit M; Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Gatt C; Bacteriology Laboratory, Pathology Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Deguara C; Sleep Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Barbara C; Bacteriology Laboratory, Pathology Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Fsadni P; Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
  • Montefort S; Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Sleep Sci ; 10(1): 28-34, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28966735
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), with limited data about the prevalence of respiratory infections and microbial colonization in these patients.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to determine if CPAP use is associated with respiratory infections and to identify the organisms that colonize or infect these patients.

METHOD:

A retrospective, case-controlled study in patients diagnosed with OSA was carried out. 137 patients were recruited and interviewed using a questionnaire. A nasal swab was taken from each patient. Patients using CPAP machines had swabs taken from masks and humidifiers.

RESULTS:

66 (48.2%) patients received CPAP treatment with 60.6% of them having a heated humidifier. 78.8% were male, with the majority using a full face mask (63.6%). No significant difference was seen in the prevalence of rhinosinusitis, lower respiratory tract infections and hospital admissions for pneumonia between CPAP and non-CPAP treated patients. The presence of a humidifier did not influence the prevalence of infections. Commensal flora was predominantly cultured from nasal swabs from both patient groups. Coagulase Negative Staphylococci and Diphtheroids were the main organisms cultured from masks and humidifiers respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study shows that the use of CPAP, choice of mask and humidifier have no significant impact on the prevalence of infections and micro-organisms isolated. This is very reassuring to the physician prescribing CPAP therapy and users.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article