Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hypotension during induction of anaesthesia is neither a reliable nor a useful quality measure for comparison of anaesthetists' performance.
Epstein, R H; Dexter, F; Schwenk, E S.
Afiliação
  • Epstein RH; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
  • Dexter F; Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Schwenk ES; Department of Anesthesiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Br J Anaesth ; 119(1): 106-114, 2017 Jul 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28974070
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Identification of statistically reliable outcomes for comparison among anaesthetists is challenging. Time-weighted intraoperative mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg (AUC 65 ) is associated with increased odds for myocardial damage. We explored retrospectively whether such hypotension before incision was statistically reliable for peer comparison.

METHODS:

We retrieved electronic data between 2006 and 2015 at a tertiary care, academic hospital in the USA for patients at risk for myocardial damage (inpatient after surgery, ASA physical status ≥III, ≥50 yr of age, and case duration ≥60 min). We determined the percentage of anaesthetists comparable based on caseload and case-mix. The AUC 65 was compared amongst anaesthetists supervising ≥100 cases involving at-risk patients during the last 12 months.

RESULTS:

Only 14.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.6-14.5%] of cases involved patients who were 'at risk' during the 10 yr study period. A yearly average of 49 ( sd 6) anaesthetists supervised ≥100 cases of any type, of whom only 52% (95% CI 47.1-56.0%) supervised ≥100 cases involving at-risk patients. Thus, nearly half the anaesthetists would have been excluded from peer comparison. During the last 12 months, there were two outliers among 34 evaluable anaesthetists ( P <0.05, controlling for false discovery). However, their contribution to total hypotension amongst cases for all patients was small, because hypotension was widely distributed (e.g. 80% of hypotension attributable to 61.8% of anaesthetists, 95% CI 59.8-63.7%). There was no relationship between the AUC 65 and propofol induction dose.

CONCLUSIONS:

The AUC 65 of time-weighted pre-incision hypotension is not a suitable metric for comparing anaesthetists. There were few at-risk patients, half the anaesthetists were not evaluable because of their case-mix and caseload, and hypotension was widely distributed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Anestesistas / Hipotensão / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Anestesistas / Hipotensão / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article