Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia with bladder detrusor overactivity].
Shen, Jun-Wen; DU, Chuan-Jun; Bai, Fu-Ding; Wang, Rong-Jiang.
Afiliação
  • Shen JW; Department of Urology, Huzhou First People's Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China.
  • DU CJ; Department of Urology, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China.
  • Bai FD; Department of Urology, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China.
  • Wang RJ; Department of Urology, Huzhou First People's Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue ; 22(8): 720-724, 2016 Aug.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29019229
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare and analyze the effects of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with bladder detrusor overactivity.

METHODS:

his study included 51 cases of BPH with bladder detrusor overactivity treated by TURP and another 58 treated by HoLEP. We evaluated the urination of the two groups of patients during the recovery period and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS:

There were no statistically significant differences in such baseline data as the blood PSA level, prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QOL) between the two groups of patients, except in effective bladder capacity, which was higher in the TURP than in the HoLEP group (ï¼»315±59ï¼½ vs ï¼»287±76ï¼½ ml, P<0.05). Urine storage symptoms were obviously improved in both of the groups postoperatively, with the storage symptoms score significantly decreased from 12.6±4.9 preoperatively to 7.5±3.9 at 3 months and 6.1±4.2 at 6 months after surgery in the TURP group (P<0.01) and from 13.7±5.7 to 7.9±4.2 and 7.0±5.1 in the HoLEP group (P<0.01). HoLEP manifested significant advantages over TURP in the postoperative urethral catheterization time (ï¼»2.7±0.8ï¼½ vs ï¼»5.1±1.2ï¼½ d, P<0.05), postoperative bladder contracture time (ï¼»4.1±1.9ï¼½ vs ï¼»5.8±2.4ï¼½ d, P<0.05), postoperative hospital stay (ï¼»4.4±1.8ï¼½ vs ï¼»5.9±2.5ï¼½ d, P<0.05), and improvement of the maximum urinary flow rate, which was increased from (7.9±3.7) ml/s preoperatively to (16.8±4.3) ml/s at 3 months after surgery in the HoLEP group and from (8.6±3.2) ml/s to (14.6±4.3) ml/s in the TURP group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Both TURP and HoLEP can improve bladder function and detrusor overactivity in BPH patients, with similar effects in improving urination at 3 to 6 months after surgery. However, HoLEP has more advantages over TURP during the period of postoperative recovery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa / Lasers de Estado Sólido Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa / Lasers de Estado Sólido Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article