Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimation of a significance threshold for epigenome-wide association studies.
Saffari, Ayden; Silver, Matt J; Zavattari, Patrizia; Moi, Loredana; Columbano, Amedeo; Meaburn, Emma L; Dudbridge, Frank.
Afiliação
  • Saffari A; Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Silver MJ; MRC Unit, The Gambia and MRC International Nutrition Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Zavattari P; Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Moi L; MRC Unit, The Gambia and MRC International Nutrition Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Columbano A; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
  • Meaburn EL; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
  • Dudbridge F; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
Genet Epidemiol ; 42(1): 20-33, 2018 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29034560
ABSTRACT
Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) are designed to characterise population-level epigenetic differences across the genome and link them to disease. Most commonly, they assess DNA-methylation status at cytosine-guanine dinucleotide (CpG) sites, using platforms such as the Illumina 450k array that profile a subset of CpGs genome wide. An important challenge in the context of EWAS is determining a significance threshold for declaring a CpG site as differentially methylated, taking multiple testing into account. We used a permutation method to estimate a significance threshold specifically for the 450k array and a simulation extrapolation approach to estimate a genome-wide threshold. These methods were applied to five different EWAS datasets derived from a variety of populations and tissue types. We obtained an estimate of α=2.4×10-7 for the 450k array, and a genome-wide estimate of α=3.6×10-8. We further demonstrate the importance of these results by showing that previously recommended sample sizes for EWAS should be adjusted upwards, requiring samples between ∼10% and ∼20% larger in order to maintain type-1 errors at the desired level.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Genoma Humano / Ilhas de CpG / Metilação de DNA / Epigênese Genética / Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Infant / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Genoma Humano / Ilhas de CpG / Metilação de DNA / Epigênese Genética / Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Infant / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article