Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-dose CT detects more progression of bone formation in comparison to conventional radiography in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results from the SIAS cohort.
de Koning, Anoek; de Bruin, Freek; van den Berg, Rosaline; Ramiro, Sofia; Baraliakos, Xenofon; Braun, Juergen; van Gaalen, Floris A; Reijnierse, Monique; van der Heijde, Désirée.
Afiliação
  • de Koning A; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • de Bruin F; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van den Berg R; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Ramiro S; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Baraliakos X; Department of Rheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Herne, Germany.
  • Braun J; Department of Rheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Herne, Germany.
  • van Gaalen FA; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Reijnierse M; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van der Heijde D; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 77(2): 293-299, 2018 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29127092
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the CT Syndesmophyte Score (CTSS) for low-dose CT (ldCT) with the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) for conventional radiographs (CR) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS:

Patients with AS in the Sensitive Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis cohort had lateral cervical and lumbar spine CR and whole spine ldCT at baseline and 2 years. CR and ldCT images were scored by two readers, paired by patient, blinded to time order, per imaging modality. For the total score analysis, we used average scores of readers per corner on CR or quadrant on ldCT. For the syndesmophyte analysis we used individual reader and consensus scores, regarding new or growing syndesmophyte at the same corner/quadrant.

RESULTS:

50 patients were included in the syndesmophyte analysis and 37 in the total score analysis. Mean (SD) status scores for mSASSS (range 0-72) and CTSS (range 0-552) at baseline were 17.9 (13.8) and 161.6 (126.6), and mean progression was 2.4 (3.8) and 17.9 (22.1). Three times as many patients showed new or growing syndesmophytes at ≥3 quadrants on ldCT compared with ≥3 corners on CR for individual readers; for consensus this increased to five times. In 50 patients, 36 new or growing syndesmophytes are seen on CR compared with 151 on ldCT, most being found in the thoracic spine.

CONCLUSIONS:

ldCT, covering the whole spine, detects more progression in the form of new and growing syndesmophytes in patients with AS compared with CR, which is limited to the cervical and lumbar spine. Most progression occurred in the thoracic spine.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coluna Vertebral / Espondilite Anquilosante / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Progressão da Doença Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coluna Vertebral / Espondilite Anquilosante / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Progressão da Doença Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article