Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized Trial of Endovascular Embolization Treatment in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: Fibered Platinum Coils versus Vascular Plugs with 1-Year Clinical Outcomes.
Guirola, Jose A; Sánchez-Ballestin, Maria; Sierre, Sergio; Lahuerta, Celia; Mayoral, Victoria; De Gregorio, Miguel A.
Afiliação
  • Guirola JA; Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Group (GITMI), University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, Zaragoza 50009, Spain.
  • Sánchez-Ballestin M; Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Group (GITMI), University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, Zaragoza 50009, Spain.
  • Sierre S; Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Group (GITMI), University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, Zaragoza 50009, Spain; Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Hospital J.P. Garrahan, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Lahuerta C; Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Group (GITMI), University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, Zaragoza 50009, Spain.
  • Mayoral V; Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Group (GITMI), University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, Zaragoza 50009, Spain.
  • De Gregorio MA; Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Group (GITMI), University of Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, Zaragoza 50009, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: mgregori@unizar.es.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(1): 45-53, 2018 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29174618
PURPOSE: To compare safety and efficacy of vascular plugs (VPs) and fibered platinum coils (FPCs) for embolization in pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, prospective, single-center study enrolled 100 women with PCS from January 2014 to January 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, and embolization was performed with FPCs (n = 50) or VPs (n = 50). Mean age of patients was 42.7 years ± 7.60, and mean visual analog scale (VAS) score for pelvic pain before treatment was 7.4 ± 7.60. Primary outcome (clinical success at 1 y using a VAS), number of devices, procedure and fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, costs, and complications were compared, and participants were followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Clinical success and subjective improvement were not significantly different at 1-year follow-up (89.7% for FPCs vs 90.6% for VPs; P = .760). Mean number of devices per case was 18.2 ± 1.33 for FPCs and 4.1 ± 0.31 for VPs (P < .001). Three FPCs and 1 VP migrated to pulmonary vasculature approximately 3-6 months after the embolization procedure; all were retrieved without complications. The FPC group had a significantly longer fluoroscopy time (33.4 min ± 4.68 vs 19.5 min ± 6.14) and larger radiation dose (air kerma 948.0 mGy ± 248.45 vs 320.7 mGy ± 134.33) (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Embolization for PCS resulted in pain relief in 90% of patients; clinical success was not affected by embolic device. VPs were associated with decreased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Varizes / Insuficiência Venosa / Dor Pélvica / Embolização Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Varizes / Insuficiência Venosa / Dor Pélvica / Embolização Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article