Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aflibercept treatment for neovascular AMD beyond the first year: consensus recommendations by a UK expert roundtable panel, 2017 update.
Patel, Praveen J; Devonport, Helen; Sivaprasad, Sobha; Ross, Adam H; Walters, Gavin; Gale, Richard P; Lotery, Andrew J; Mahmood, Sajjad; Talks, James S; Napier, Jackie.
Afiliação
  • Patel PJ; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
  • Devonport H; The Ophthalmology Department, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
  • Sivaprasad S; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
  • Ross AH; The Ophthalmology Department, Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK.
  • Walters G; Department of Ophthalmology, Harrogate District Hospital, Harrogate, UK.
  • Gale RP; The Ophthalmology Department, The York Hospital and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
  • Lotery AJ; Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Mahmood S; Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
  • Talks JS; Newcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Napier J; Medical Affairs, Bayer plc, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 11: 1957-1966, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29184385
ABSTRACT
National recommendations on continued administration of aflibercept solution for injection after the first year of treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) have been developed by an expert panel of UK retina specialists, based on clinician experience and treatment outcomes seen in year 2. The 2017 update reiterates that the treatment goal is to maintain or improve the macular structural and functional gains achieved in year 1 while attempting to reduce or minimize the treatment burden, recognizing the need for ongoing treatment. At the end of year 1 (ie, the decision visit at month 11), two treatment options should be considered do not extend the treatment interval and maintain fixed 8-weekly dosing, or extend the treatment interval using a treat-and-extend regimen up to a maximum 12 weeks. Criteria for considering not extending the treatment interval are persistent macular fluid with stable vision, recurrent fluid, decrease in vision in the presence of fluid, macular hemorrhage, new choroidal neovascularization or any other sign(s) of exudative disease activity considered vision threatening in the opinion of the treating clinician. Treatment extension is recommended for eyes with a dry macula (ie, without macular fluid) and stable vision. Under both options, the treatment interval may be shortened if visual and/or anatomic outcomes deteriorate. Monitoring without treatment may be considered for eyes with a fluid-free macula for a minimum duration of 48 weeks. A patient completing one full year of monitoring without requiring injections may be considered for discharge from clinic. The treatment algorithm incorporates return to fixed 8-weekly dosing for disease reactivation during treatment extension and reinstatement of treatment for disease recurrence following discontinuation or discharge. For bilateral nAMD, either the eye requiring the more intensive treatment or the eye with the better vision, guided by local clinical practice, should determine the retreatment schedule overall.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article