Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-precision radiotherapy of motor deficits due to metastatic spinal cord compression (PRE-MODE): a multicenter phase 2 study.
Rades, Dirk; Cacicedo, Jon; Conde-Moreno, Antonio J; Doemer, Claudia; Dunst, Jürgen; Lomidze, Darejan; Segedin, Barbara; Olbrich, Denise; Holländer, Niels Henrik.
Afiliação
  • Rades D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562, Lübeck, Germany. rades.dirk@gmx.net.
  • Cacicedo J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
  • Conde-Moreno AJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
  • Doemer C; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Dunst J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Lomidze D; Radiation Oncology Department, High Technology Medical Center, University Clinic Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia.
  • Segedin B; Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Olbrich D; Centre for Clinical Trials Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Holländer NH; Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
BMC Cancer ; 17(1): 818, 2017 Dec 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29202720
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), conventional radiotherapy with 10 × 3 Gy in 2 weeks results in better local progression-free survival (LPFS) than 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. Since patients with MSCC are often significantly impaired, an overall treatment time of 1 week would be preferable if resulting in similar outcomes as longer programs. This may be achieved with 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week, since the biologically effective dose is similar to 10 × 3 Gy. It can be expected that 5 × 5 Gy (like 10 × 3) Gy results in better LPFS than 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. METHODS/

DESIGN:

This phase 2 study investigates LPFS after high-precision RT with 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week. LPFS is defined as freedom from both progression of motor deficits during RT and new or progressive motor deficits dur to an in-field recurrence of MSCC following RT. Considering the tolerance dose of the spinal cord, 5 × 5 Gy can be safely administered with high-precision radiotherapy such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Maximum dose to the spinal cord should not exceed 101.5% of the prescribed dose to keep the risk of radiation myelopathy below 0.03%. Primary endpoint is LPFS at 6 months following radiotherapy; secondary endpoints include motor function/ability to walk, sensory function, sphincter dysfunction, LPFS directly and 1 and 3 months following radiotherapy, overall survival, pain relief, quality of life and toxicity. Follow-up visits will be performed directly and at 1, 3 and 6 months following radiotherapy. After completion of this phase 2 study, patients will be compared to a historical control group receiving conventional radiotherapy with 5 × 4 Gy in 1 week. Forty-four patients will be included assuming 5 × 5 Gy will provide the same benefit in LPFS when compared to 5 × 4 Gy as reported for 10 × 3 Gy.

DISCUSSION:

If superiority regarding LPFS is shown for high-precision radiotherapy with 5 × 5 Gy when compared to conventional radiotherapy with 5 × 4 Gy, patients with MSCC would benefit from 5 × 5 Gy, since high LPFS rates could be achieved with 1 week of radiotherapy instead of 2 weeks (10 × 3 Gy). TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT03070431 . Registered 27 February 2017.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compressão da Medula Espinal / Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral / Transtornos Motores Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compressão da Medula Espinal / Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral / Transtornos Motores Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article