Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Abnormal placental cord insertion and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ismail, Khadijah Irfah; Hannigan, Ailish; O'Donoghue, Keelin; Cotter, Amanda.
Afiliação
  • Ismail KI; Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. khadijah.ismail@ul.ie.
  • Hannigan A; Biostatistics Department, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • O'Donoghue K; Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Cotter A; Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Syst Rev ; 6(1): 242, 2017 12 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29208042
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Abnormal placental cord insertion (PCI) includes marginal cord insertion (MCI) and velamentous cord insertion (VCI). VCI has been shown to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the association of abnormal PCI and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS:

Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Databases were searched in December 2016 (from inception to December 2016). The reference lists of eligible studies were scrutinized to identify further studies. Potentially eligible studies were reviewed by two authors independently using the following inclusion criteria singleton pregnancies, velamentous cord insertion, marginal cord insertion, and pregnancy outcomes. Case reports and series were excluded. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Outcomes for meta-analysis were dichotomous and results are presented as summary risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS:

Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review, all of which were assessed as good quality. Normal PCI and MCI were grouped together as non-VCI and compared with VCI in seven studies. Four studies compared MCI, VCI, and normal PCI separately. Two other studies compared MCI with normal PCI, and VCI was excluded from their analysis. Studies in this systematic review reported an association between abnormal PCI, defined differently across studies, with preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), low birthweight (< 2500 g), emergency cesarean delivery, and intrauterine fetal death. Four cohort studies comparing MCI, VCI, and normal PCI separately were included in a meta-analysis resulting in a statistically significant increased risk of emergency cesarean delivery for VCI (pooled RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.56-5.22, P = 0.0006) and abnormal PCI (pooled RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.33-2.36, P < 0.0001) compared to normal PCI.

CONCLUSIONS:

The available evidence suggests an association between abnormal PCI and emergency cesarean delivery. However, the number of studies with comparable definitions of abnormal PCI was small, limiting the analysis of other adverse pregnancy outcomes, and further research is required.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Placenta / Doenças Placentárias / Complicações na Gravidez / Cordão Umbilical / Resultado da Gravidez Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Placenta / Doenças Placentárias / Complicações na Gravidez / Cordão Umbilical / Resultado da Gravidez Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article