Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The minimum follow-up required for radial head arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Laumonerie, P; Reina, N; Kerezoudis, P; Declaux, S; Tibbo, M E; Bonnevialle, N; Mansat, P.
Afiliação
  • Laumonerie P; Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Place du Dr Baylac, TSA 40 031, Toulouse 31059, France.
  • Reina N; Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Place du Dr Baylac, TSA 40 031, Toulouse 31059, France.
  • Kerezoudis P; Mayo Clinic, 1216 2nd Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
  • Declaux S; Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Place du Dr Baylac, TSA 40 031, Toulouse 31059, France.
  • Tibbo ME; Mayo Clinic, 1216 2nd Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
  • Bonnevialle N; Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Place du Dr Baylac, TSA 40 031, Toulouse 31059, France.
  • Mansat P; Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Place du Dr Baylac, TSA 40 031, Toulouse 31059, France.
Bone Joint J ; 99-B(12): 1561-1570, 2017 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29212677
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The primary aim of this study was to define the standard minimum follow-up required to produce a reliable estimate of the rate of re-operation after radial head arthroplasty (RHA). The secondary objective was to define the leading reasons for re-operation. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Four electronic databases, between January 2000 and March 2017 were searched. Articles reporting reasons for re-operation (Group I) and results (Group II) after RHA were included. In Group I, a meta-analysis was performed to obtain the standard minimum follow-up, the mean time to re-operation and the reason for failure. In Group II, the minimum follow-up for each study was compared with the standard minimum follow-up.

RESULTS:

A total of 40 studies were analysed three were Group I and included 80 implants and 37 were Group II and included 1192 implants. In Group I, the mean time to re-operation was 1.37 years (0 to 11.25), the standard minimum follow-up was 3.25 years; painful loosening was the main indication for re-operation. In Group II, 33 Group II articles (89.2%) reported a minimum follow-up of < 3.25 years.

CONCLUSION:

The literature does not provide a reliable estimate of the rate of re-operation after RHA. The reproducibility of results would be improved by using a minimum follow-up of three years combined with a consensus of the definition of the reasons for failure after RHA. Cite this article Bone Joint J 2017;99-B1561-70.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia / Rádio (Anatomia) / Fraturas do Rádio / Reoperação / Articulação do Cotovelo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia / Rádio (Anatomia) / Fraturas do Rádio / Reoperação / Articulação do Cotovelo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article