Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for cluster headache, results from a large, open-label European registry.
Barloese, Mads; Petersen, Anja; Stude, Philipp; Jürgens, Tim; Jensen, Rigmor Højland; May, Arne.
Afiliação
  • Barloese M; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark. mads.christian.johannes.barloese@regionh.dk.
  • Petersen A; Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark. mads.christian.johannes.barloese@regionh.dk.
  • Stude P; Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
  • Jürgens T; Schmerztherapie, Geriatrie und Palliativmedizin, Bochum, Kurt-Schumacher-Platz, 11-12 44787, Bochum, Germany.
  • Jensen RH; Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, Gehlsherimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
  • May A; Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Nordre Ringvej 57, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
J Headache Pain ; 19(1): 6, 2018 Jan 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29349561
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cluster headache (CH) is a disabling primary headache disorder characterized by severe periorbital pain. A subset of patients does not respond to established pharmacological therapy. This study examines outcomes of a cohort of mainly chronic CH patients treated with sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) stimulation.

METHODS:

Patients were followed in an open-label prospective study for 12 months. Ninety-seven CH patients (88 chronic, 9 episodic) underwent trans-oral insertion of a microstimulator targeting the SPG. Patients recorded stimulation effect prospectively for individual attacks. Frequency, use of preventive and acute medications, headache impact (HIT-6) and quality of life measures (SF-36v2) were monitored at clinic visits. Per protocol, frequency responders experienced ≥ 50% reduction in attack frequency and acute responders treated ≥ 50% of attacks. HIT-6 responders experienced an improvement ≥ 2.3 units and SF-36 responders ≥ 4 units vs. baseline.

RESULTS:

Eighty-five patients (78 chronic, 7 episodic) remained implanted and were evaluated for effectiveness at 12 months. In total, 68% of all patients were responders, 55% of chronic patients were frequency responders and 32% of all patients were acute responders. 67% of patients using acute treatments were able to reduce the use of these by 52% and 74% of chronic patients were able to stop, reduce or remain off all preventive medications. 59% of all patients were HIT-6 responders, 67% were SF-36 responders.

CONCLUSIONS:

This open-label registry corroborates that SPG stimulation is an effective therapy for CH patients providing therapeutic benefits and improvements in use of medication as well as headache impact and quality of life.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema de Registros / Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Cefaleia Histamínica / Gânglios Parassimpáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema de Registros / Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Cefaleia Histamínica / Gânglios Parassimpáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article