Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Foveal Avascular Zone Area Measurement on Normal Eyes by Different Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Instruments.
Pilotto, Elisabetta; Frizziero, Luisa; Crepaldi, Anna; Della Dora, Enrico; Deganello, Davide; Longhin, Evelyn; Convento, Enrica; Parrozzani, Raffaele; Midena, Edoardo.
Afiliação
  • Pilotto E; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Frizziero L; G.B. Bietti Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Crepaldi A; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Della Dora E; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Deganello D; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Longhin E; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Convento E; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Parrozzani R; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Midena E; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Ophthalmic Res ; 59(4): 206-211, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29421813
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area measurements produced by different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

METHODS:

Healthy enrolled volunteers underwent OCTA using 2 different devices Spectralis HRA+OCTA (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and RS-3000 Advance (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan). Two graders measured FAZ in both superficial (SCP) and deep (DCP) retinal capillary plexuses. The SCP and DCP en face images were visualized automatically segmenting 2 separate slabs defined by the arbitrary segmentation lines created by the software of each OCT device. One grader repeated each measure twice.

RESULTS:

Fifty-nine eyes were included. The mean FAZ was 0.33 ± 0.09 mm2 at the SCP and 0.57 ± 0.17 mm2 at the DCP measured with RS-3000 versus 0.30 ± 0.08 and 0.35 ± 0.08 mm2, respectively, measured with Spectralis. The measurements of the 2 devices were significantly different (p < 0.0001). The intraoperator agreement was excellent at the SCP (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 0.97 with Spectralis and 0.96 with RS-3000). At the DCP, it was good with Spectralis and fair with RS-3000 (ICC 0.85 and 0.64, respectively). The interoperator agreement was excellent for Spectralis and good for RS-3000 at the SCP (ICC 0.97 and 0.93, respectively). It was good at the DCP with both devices (ICC 0.74 with RS-3000 and 0.81 with Spectralis).

CONCLUSIONS:

FAZ measurements obtained with different OCTA devices differ. These findings should be considered in follow-up studies of patients with retinal vascular diseases.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Angiofluoresceinografia / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica / Fóvea Central Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Angiofluoresceinografia / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica / Fóvea Central Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article