Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of a multicomponent self-management intervention for adults with epilepsy (ZMILE study): A randomized controlled trial.
Leenen, Loes A M; Wijnen, Ben F M; Kessels, Alfons G H; Chan, HoiYau; de Kinderen, Reina J A; Evers, Silvia M A A; van Heugten, Caroline M; Majoie, Marian H J M.
Afiliação
  • Leenen LAM; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Academic Centre for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe Maastricht UMC+, The Netherlands
  • Wijnen BFM; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Academic Centre for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe Maastricht UMC+, The Netherlands
  • Kessels AGH; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: fons.kessels@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • Chan H; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: h.chan@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • de Kinderen RJA; Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: RKinderen@trimbos.nl.
  • Evers SMAA; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s
  • van Heugten CM; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Faculty of Psychology and Neurosciences: Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.vanheugten@ma
  • Majoie MHJM; Department of Research & Development, Academic Centre for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe Maastricht UMC+, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Academic Centre for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe Maastricht UMC+, The Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University
Epilepsy Behav ; 80: 259-265, 2018 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29449140
BACKGROUND: The objective of the ZMILE study was to compare the effectiveness of a multicomponent self-management intervention (MCI) with care as usual (CAU) in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE) over a six-month period. METHODS: Participants (PWE & relative) were randomized into intervention or CAU groups. Self-report questionnaires were used to measure disease-specific self-efficacy as the primary outcome measure and general self-efficacy, adherence, seizure severity, emotional functioning, quality of life, proactive coping, and side-effects of antiepileptic drugs (AED) as secondary outcome measures. Instruments used at baseline and during a six-month follow-up period were the following: disease-specific self-efficacy (Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale [ESES], General Self-Efficacy Scale [GSES]); adherence (Medication Adherence Scale [MARS] and Medication Event Monitoring System [MEMS]); seizure severity (National Hospital Seizure Severity Scale [NHS3]); emotional well-being (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]); quality of life (Quality of Life in Epilepsy [QOLIE-31P]); proactive coping (Utrecht Proactive Coping Competence [UPCC]); and side-effects of antiepileptic drugs [SIDAED]. Multilevel analyses were performed, and baseline differences were corrected by inclusion of covariates in the analyses. RESULTS: In total, 102 PWE were included in the study, 52 of whom were in the intervention group. On the SIDAED and on three of the quality of life subscales QOLIE-31P, a significant difference was found (p<0.05) in the intervention group. Self-efficacy, however, showed no significant differences between the MCI and the CAU groups. None of the other outcome measures showed any significant difference between the two groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Although we found no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome measure, disease-specific self-efficacy, this MCI could prove promising, since we found improvement in some domains of quality of life in epilepsy scale and a decrease in AED side-effects in the MCI group compared with the CAU group.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Autoeficácia / Epilepsia / Adesão à Medicação / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Autoeficácia / Epilepsia / Adesão à Medicação / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article