Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sero-prevalence of chlamydiosis in cattle and selected wildlife species at a wildlife/livestock interface area of Zimbabwe.
Ndengu, Masimba; Matope, Gift; Tivapasi, Musavengana; Scacchia, Massimo; Bonfini, Barbara; Pfukenyi, Davis Mubika; de Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel.
Afiliação
  • Ndengu M; Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe. masimbandengu@gmail.com.
  • Matope G; Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership, P.O. Box 1378, Harare, Zimbabwe. masimbandengu@gmail.com.
  • Tivapasi M; Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership, P.O. Box 1378, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Scacchia M; Department of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Bonfini B; Department of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Pfukenyi DM; Research Platform Production and Conservation in Partnership, P.O. Box 1378, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • de Garine-Wichatitsky M; Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e Del Molise "G.Caporale", Via Campo Boario, 64100, Teramo, Italy.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 50(5): 1107-1117, 2018 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29464541
ABSTRACT
A study was conducted to investigate the seroprevalence and associated risk factors of Chlamydia abortus infection in cattle and some selected wildlife species at selected interface areas at the periphery of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area in Zimbabwe. Three study sites were selected based on the type of livestock-wildlife interface, porous livestock-wildlife interface (unrestricted), non-porous livestock-wildlife interface (restricted by fencing), and livestock-wildlife non-interface (totally absent or control). Sera were collected from cattle aged ≥ 2 years representing both female and intact male. Sera were also collected from selected wild ungulates from Mabalauta (porous interface) and Chipinda Pools (non-interface) areas of the Gonarezhou National Park. Sera were tested for antibodies to Chlamydia abortus using a CFT. A X 2 test was used to assess differences between categories and p < 0.05 was considered as significant. In cattle, the overall seroprevalence was 32.7% (327/1011; 95% CI 29.5-35.3). A significantly lower seroprevalence was recorded for the porous interface (24.2%) compared to the non-porous (42.5%) (p < 0.0001) and the non-interface (36.2%) (p = 0.001). Overall, the wet season recorded a significantly (p = 0.015) higher seroprevalence than the dry season. In wildlife, antibodies were detected in buffaloes (47.7%) and impalas (43.8%) but not in kudus. Buffaloes from Chipinda Pools (53.4%) had a significantly (p = 0.036) higher seroprevalence than those from Mabalauta (26.1%). The results established the presence of chlamydiosis in cattle and selected wildlife and that independent infections may be maintained in buffalo populations. Further studies are required to clarify chlamydiae circulating between cattle and wildlife.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Chlamydia / Doenças dos Bovinos / Animais Selvagens Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Chlamydia / Doenças dos Bovinos / Animais Selvagens Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article