Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing Viral Transfer During Doffing of Ebola-Level Personal Protective Equipment in a Biocontainment Unit.
Casanova, Lisa M; Erukunuakpor, Kimberly; Kraft, Colleen S; Mumma, Joel M; Durso, Francis T; Ferguson, Ashley N; Gipson, Christina L; Walsh, Victoria L; Zimring, Craig; DuBose, Jennifer; Jacob, Jesse T.
Afiliação
  • Casanova LM; Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Georgia State University.
  • Erukunuakpor K; Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Georgia State University.
  • Kraft CS; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University.
  • Mumma JM; School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
  • Durso FT; School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
  • Ferguson AN; School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
  • Gipson CL; School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
  • Walsh VL; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine.
  • Zimring C; School of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
  • DuBose J; School of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
  • Jacob JT; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine.
Clin Infect Dis ; 66(6): 945-949, 2018 03 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29471475
ABSTRACT

Background:

Personal protective equipment (PPE) protects healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD), and PPE doffing is a critical point for preventing viral self-contamination. We assessed contamination of skin, gloves, and scrubs after doffing Ebola-level PPE contaminated with surrogate viruses bacteriophages MS2 and Φ6.

Methods:

In a medical biocontainment unit, HCWs (n = 10) experienced in EVD care donned and doffed PPE following unit protocols that incorporate trained observer guidance and alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR). A mixture of Φ6 (enveloped), MS2 (nonenveloped), and fluorescent marker was applied to 4 PPE sites, approximating body fluid viral load (Φ6, 105; MS2, 106). They performed a patient care task, then doffed. Inner gloves, face, hands, and scrubs were sampled for virus, as were environmental sites with visible fluorescent marker.

Results:

Among 10 HCWs there was no Φ6 transfer to inner gloves, hands, or face; 1 participant had Φ6 on scrubs at low levels (1.4 × 102). MS2 transfer (range, 101-106) was observed to scrubs (n = 2), hands (n = 1), and inner gloves (n = 7), where it was highest. Most (n = 8) had only 1 positive site. Environmental samples with visible fluorescent marker (n = 21) were negative.

Conclusions:

Among experienced HCWs, structured, observed doffing using ABHR protected against hand contamination with enveloped virus. Nonenveloped virus was infrequent on hands and scrubs but common on inner gloves, suggesting that inner gloves, but not necessarily ABHR, protect against hand contamination. Optimizing doffing protocols to protect against all types of viruses may require reinforcing careful handling of scrubs and good glove/hand hygiene with effective agents.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Luvas Protetoras / Doença pelo Vírus Ebola / Contenção de Riscos Biológicos / Equipamento de Proteção Individual Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Luvas Protetoras / Doença pelo Vírus Ebola / Contenção de Riscos Biológicos / Equipamento de Proteção Individual Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article