Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bioactive leptin is stronger related to parameters of fat mass and distribution than conventionally measured leptin: Findings from a longitudinal study in obese children participating in a lifestyle intervention.
Niklowitz, Petra; Rothermel, Juliane; Lass, Nina; Barth, Andre; Reinehr, Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Niklowitz P; Vestische Hospital for Children and Adolescents Datteln, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
  • Rothermel J; Vestische Hospital for Children and Adolescents Datteln, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
  • Lass N; Vestische Hospital for Children and Adolescents Datteln, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
  • Barth A; Vestische Hospital for Children and Adolescents Datteln, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
  • Reinehr T; Vestische Hospital for Children and Adolescents Datteln, University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany. Electronic address: T.Reinehr@kinderklinik-datteln.de.
Clin Chim Acta ; 480: 225-229, 2018 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29476734
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study analyzed the relationships between bioactive leptin, conventionally measured leptin, and parameters of fat mass and distribution in obese children before and after weight reduction.

METHODS:

We determined bioactive leptin (bioLep), conventional measured leptin (conLep), weight, height, body fat based on skinfold measurements and bioimpedance analyses, waist circumference (wc), and pubertal stage in 88 obese children participating in a lifestyle intervention at baseline and one year later.

RESULTS:

We identified no child with homozygous or heterozygous status for bioinactive leptin mutations. The baseline associations between bioLep and BMI (r = 0.53), BMI-SDS (r = 0.48), body fat (bioimpedance r = 0.61, skinfold thickness r = 0.49), wc (r = 0.42), and waist to height ratio (whr) (r = 0.39) were stronger than the associations between conLep and BMI (r = 0.50), BMI-SDS (r = 0.44), body fat (bioimpedance r = 0.57, skinfold thickness r = 0.41), wc (r = 0.41), and whr (r = 0.37). The changes of bioLep were stronger related to changes of BMI-SDS (r = 0.54), body fat (bioimpedance r = 0.59, skinfold thickness r = 0.37), wc (r = 0.22), and whr (r = 0.21) than the associations between changes of conLep and changes of BMI-SDS (r = 0.48), body fat (bioimpedance r = 0.56, skinfold thickness r = 0.43), wc (r = 0.20), and whr (r = 0.20). The same findings were observed in multiple linear regression analyses adjusted to multiple confounders. In contrast to changes of conLep (r = 0.22), the changes of bioLep during intervention were not related to weight regain after the end of intervention. BioLep concentrations did not differ between prepubertal girls and boys, but were higher in pubertal girls compared to pubertal boys (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS:

Bioactive leptin was stronger related to fat mass and distribution compared to conventionally measured leptin.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imunoensaio / Tecido Adiposo / Leptina / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imunoensaio / Tecido Adiposo / Leptina / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article