Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of tedizolid versus linezolid in patients with skin and soft tissue infections in Japan - Results of a randomised, multicentre phase 3 study.
Mikamo, Hiroshige; Takesue, Yoshio; Iwamoto, Yuji; Tanigawa, Takahiko; Kato, Masaharu; Tanimura, Yoko; Kohno, Shigeru.
Afiliação
  • Mikamo H; Department of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan. Electronic address: mikamo@aichi-med-u.ac.jp.
  • Takesue Y; Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Iwamoto Y; Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
  • Tanigawa T; Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
  • Kato M; Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
  • Tanimura Y; Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
  • Kohno S; Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
J Infect Chemother ; 24(6): 434-442, 2018 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29530544
ABSTRACT
The objective of this open-label, randomised (i.e. 21 ratio), Phase 3 study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tedizolid phosphate 200 mg, once-daily treatment with that of linezolid 600 mg, twice-daily treatment for 7-14 days in Japanese adult patients (N = 125) with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and/or for 7-21 days for those with SSTI-related bacteraemia, caused by confirmed or highly suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Primary outcome was clinical cure rate at test-of-cure (TOC, in SSTI 7-14 days, in bacteraemia 4-6 weeks after end-of-therapy [EOT]) time point in the microbiologically evaluable MRSA (ME-MRSA) population (N = 39). Secondary endpoints were clinical and microbiological response rates at EOT. Safety parameters were evaluated in the safety analysis population up to follow up. Data analysis was descriptive in nature. Baseline characteristics of patients were similar between treatment groups. At TOC in the ME-MRSA population, clinical cure rate was similar in tedizolid phosphate (92.6%) and linezolid (88.9%) groups. At EOT, clinical cure (tedizolid phosphate 93.1%, linezolid 90.0%) and microbiological success (tedizolid phosphate 93.1%, linezolid 100.0%) rates were similar in the ME-MRSA population. Both treatments were well tolerated; overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in tedizolid phosphate (79.5%) and linezolid (75.6%) treatment groups were similar. Drug-related TEAEs were numerically lower with tedizolid phosphate versus linezolid (30.1%; 39.0%, respectively), as well as gastrointestinal (21.7%; 26.8%) and myelosuppression-related (2.4%; 22.0%) TEAEs. One death occurred in the linezolid group. Tedizolid phosphate may be an appropriate antibiotic for the treatment of SSTIs in Japanese adult patients. International clinical trial registration number NCT01967225. Japanese clinical trial registration number JapicCTI-132308.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxazóis / Organofosfatos / Dermatopatias Bacterianas / Infecções dos Tecidos Moles / Linezolida / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxazóis / Organofosfatos / Dermatopatias Bacterianas / Infecções dos Tecidos Moles / Linezolida / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article